Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475661›Full record

ReviewJournal of the history of the neurosciences

A historical review of investigations on laterality of emotions in the human brain.

Guido Gainotti

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the history of the neurosciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Handedness in ADHD: Meta-Analyses.Neuropsychology review · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2020
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guido Gainottia Institute of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , and Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology , IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different models of emotional lateralization, advanced since the first clinical observations raised this issue, will be reviewed following their historical progression. The clinical investigations that have suggested a general dominance of the right hemisphere for all kinds of emotions and the experimental studies that have proposed a different hemispheric specialization for positive vs. negative emotions (valence hypothesis) or for approach vs. withdrawal tendencies (motivational hypothesis) will be reviewed first and extensively. This historical review will be followed by a short discussion of recent anatomo-clinical and activation studies that have investigated (a) emotional and behavioral disorders of patients with asymmetrical forms of fronto-temporal degeneration and (b) laterality effects in specific brain structures (amygdala, ventro-medial prefrontal cortex, and anterior insula) playing a critical role in different components of emotions. Overall, these studies support the hypothesis of a right hemisphere dominance for all components of the emotional system.

Indexed as

BrainBrain InjuriesEmotionsFunctional LateralityHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMalePsychophysiologyAmygdalaanterior insulaapproach vs avoidance tendenciesfronto-temporal degenerationhistory of emotional lateralitylaterality of emotionsright hemisphere hypothesisvalence hypothesisventro-medial prefrontal cortex

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.