Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475041›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2020

"It didn't fit for me:" A qualitative examination of dropout from prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy in veterans.

Natalie E Hundt, Anthony H Ecker, Karin Thompson, Ashley Helm, Tracey L Smith, Melinda A Stanley, Jeffrey A Cully

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Process Improvement for Engaging With Trauma-Focused Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for PTSD.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalie E HundtVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-4956
Anthony H EckerVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Karin ThompsonMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Ashley HelmVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Tracey L SmithVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Melinda A StanleyVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Jeffrey A CullyVA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Integration of Peer Support Across the PTSD Continuum of CareIK2HX001515 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HUNDT, NATALIE E · 2019 to 2020
–
HSR&DHSRD VA CDA 13-264HSRD VA IK2 HX001515Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical CenterVA HSR&D Houston Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma-focused psychotherapies, such as prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy, are the most effective forms of treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. These treatments are commonly delivered in the Veterans Health Administration; however, dropout means that some veterans fail to benefit. Ending treatment prematurely is a common problem across psychotherapies, with on average, 20% to 25% of patients dropping out. The purpose of this study was to examine veterans' self-reported reasons for dropping out of prolonged exposure or cognitive processing therapy. Veterans who dropped out from prolonged exposure or cognitive processing therapy (N = 28) completed qualitative interviews about their experiences. Interviews were coded by 2 coders using grounded theory. Therapy-related barriers were the largest category reported, and included lack of buy-in to the rationale or specific therapy tasks, believing that treatment was not working, alliance issues, or switching to a different treatment. Practical barriers and finding treatment "too stressful" were also common reasons for dropout. This research provides information that can shape how PTSD treatments are delivered in health care settings. Therapy-related barriers were the largest group, suggesting that providers may need to find more effective ways to communicate the rationale for these therapies or to tailor them to individual patients' needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyImplosive TherapyPatient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsQualitative ResearchStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID30475041
PMCPMC6535373
OpenAlexW2903267748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.