Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30475026›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2019

Context facilitates performance on a classic cross-cultural emotion perception task.

Katie Hoemann, Alyssa N Crittenden, Shani Msafiri, Qiang Liu, Chaojie Li, Debi Roberson, Gregory A Ruark, Maria Gendron, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Theory of Constructed Emotion: More Than a Feeling.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. What We Can Learn About Emotion by Talking With the Hadza.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Vocal communication across cultures: theoretical and methodological issues.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Introducing a Face Sort Paradigm to Evaluate Age Differences in Emotion Perception.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Words are a context for mental inference.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie HoemannDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-7676
Alyssa N CrittendenDepartment of Anthropology, University of Nevada- Las Vegas.
Shani Msafiri
Qiang LiuResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University.
Chaojie LiResearch Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University.
Debi RobersonDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex.ORCID 0000-0002-6778-8547
Gregory A RuarkFoundational Science Research Unit, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Maria GendronDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University.ORCID 0000-0003-4478-2051

Funding

Fundamental subcortical mechanisms of affective processingU01CA193632 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, SATPUTE, AJAY · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Basic mechanisms of cultural relativity in emotion perceptionF32MH105052 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GENDRON, MARIA THERESE · 2015 to 2017
$183k
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNCI NIH HHS U01 CA193632NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS F32 MH105052Royal SocietyU.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of studies designed to assess cross-cultural emotion perception use a choice-from-array task in which participants are presented with brief emotion stories and asked to choose between target and foil cues. This task has been widely criticized, evoking a lively and prolonged debate about whether it inadvertently helps participants to perform better than they otherwise would, resulting in the appearance of universality. In 3 studies, we provide a strong test of the hypothesis that the classic choice-from-array task constitutes a potent source of context that shapes performance. Participants from a remote small-scale (the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania) and 2 urban industrialized (China and the United States) cultural samples selected target vocalizations that were contrived for 6 non-English, nonuniversal emotion categories at levels significantly above chance. In studies of anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise, above chance performance is interpreted as evidence of universality. These studies support the hypothesis that choice-from-array tasks encourage evidence for cross-cultural emotion perception. We discuss these findings with reference to the history of cross-cultural emotion perception studies, and suggest several processes that may, together, give rise to the appearance of universal emotions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePerception

Identifiers

PMID30475026
PMCPMC6535382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.