Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474895›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2019

Food insecurity and food preparation equipment in US households: exploratory results from a cross-sectional questionnaire.

A R Oakley, C J Nikolaus, B Ellison, S M Nickols-Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New measures to assess the "Other" three pillars of food security-availability, utilization, and stability.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. To dine in or not to dine in: A comparison of food selection and preparation behaviours in those with and without food security.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cook-EdNutrients · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  18. Food insecurity and food preparation equipment in US households: exploratory results from a cross-sectional questionnaire.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A R OakleyDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
C J NikolausDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
B EllisonDepartment of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
S M Nickols-RichardsonDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-9790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity (FI) impacted 15.7% (5.9 million) of US households with children in 2017. These households often experience issues within one or more of the food security pillars: access, availability, utilisation or stability. An underexplored area within the pillar of utilisation that may impact FI risk is the availability of kitchen equipment in households. This exploratory project aimed to quantify household food preparation equipment ownership and use by household FI status.

methodsAn online platform (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) was used to administer a questionnaire to a sample of 135 parents of children aged 11-14 years. The instrument queried sociodemographic characteristics, food preparation items owned and frequency of use of 44 items within a 6-month interval. Household FI was measured using the 18-item US Department of Agriculture, Household Food Security Survey Module with a 12-month reference period.

resultsHouseholds experiencing FI (n = 39; 28.9%) owned an average of five fewer items than their food secure counterparts (n = 96, 71.1%, P < 0.001), reporting lower item ownership within each equipment category subgroup (i.e. large appliances, small appliances, food preparation utensils and cooking utensils; all P < 0.01). There were no differences between FI and food secure households in frequency of use (all P > 0.01).

conclusionsCompared to food secure households, the number of food preparation items owned was lower, although frequency of use was the same, in US households that were FI. Future projects should investigate how food equipment ownership impacts cooking behaviours, and whether households experiencing FI display behaviours to compensate for a differing set of equipment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCooking and Eating UtensilsCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFood SupplyHumansMaleSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescookingfoodfood preparation equipmentfood securityUS households

Identifiers

PMID30474895
PMCPMC6588011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.