Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474778›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment2019

Trends in use of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy vs high-risk surveillance in unaffected carriers of inherited breast cancer syndromes in the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE).

Danielle A Henry, Marie C Lee, Deanna Almanza, Kamran A Ahmed, Weihong Sun, David C Boulware, Christine Laronga

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Advances in Risk Management and Screening for Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: The Role of MR Imaging and Personalised Approaches.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle A HenryDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, 1400 S Orange Ave, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA. DanielleHenryMD@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8851-7968
Marie C LeeDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Deanna AlmanzaDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Kamran A AhmedDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Weihong SunDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
David C BoulwareDepartment of Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Orlando, FL, 33612, USA.
Christine LarongaDepartment of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USOrlando Health · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAwareness of inherited breast cancer has increased bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) among unaffected genetic mutation carriers, yet many still choose surveillance. We aimed to identify differences among women electing BPM vs high-risk surveillance.

methodsParticipants from an IRB-approved database recruited from 11/2000 to 01/2017 with a deleterious/pathogenic, variant suspected deleterious, or likely pathogenic mutation in ≥ 1 of 11 genes with increased risk for breast cancer (per 2017 NCCN guidelines) were identified. Participants with breast cancer and males were excluded. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. The BPM and high-risk surveillance groups were compared using Wilcoxon, Fisher's Exact, and Pearson's Chi-Square analyses.

resultsA total of 304 unaffected genetic mutation carriers were identified; 22 men were excluded. 113/282 (40%) underwent BPM. There was no significant difference in age, race, marital status, high school graduates, family history of breast cancer, breast biopsies, chemoprevention use, or understanding implications of genetic mutation carriage. BPM participants were more likely to have a prior pregnancy (p = 0.0005), college education (p = 0.04), income > $50,000/year (p = 0.01), first-degree relative with breast cancer (p = 0.04), higher total number of relatives with breast cancer (p = 0.01), and rate of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (p = < 0.0001). The high-risk surveillance group was more likely to have a history of ovarian cancer (p = 0.009) and cancer worry (p = < 0.0001).

conclusionsBPM is a common but not universal choice among unaffected genetic carriers of inherited breast cancer syndromes. Parity, education, income, ovarian cancer history, first-degree relatives with breast cancer, and cancer worry play significant roles in these decisions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedProphylactic MastectomyRegistriesWatchful WaitingYoung AdultBilateral mastectomyFamily historyGeneticsHigh-risk surveillanceInherited cancerProphylactic mastectomy

Identifiers

PMID30474778
PMCPMC7771240
OpenAlexW2900916385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.