Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474767›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Repeated craniotomies for intracranial tumors: is the risk increased? Pooled analysis of two prospective, institutional registries of complications and outcomes.

Costanza Maria Zattra, David Y Zhang, Morgan Broggi, Julia Velz, Flavio Vasella, Dominik Seggewiss, Silvia Schiavolin, Oliver Bozinov, Niklaus Krayenbühl, Johannes Sarnthein and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Costanza Maria ZattraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
David Y ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Morgan BroggiNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Julia VelzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Flavio VasellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dominik SeggewissDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Silvia SchiavolinPublic Health and Disability Unit, Department of Neurology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Oliver BozinovDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niklaus KrayenbühlDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Johannes SarntheinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paolo FerroliNeurosurgical Unit 2, Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin N StienenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich and Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. mnstienen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-1787
University of Zurich · CHFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeciding whether to re-operate patients with intracranial tumor recurrence or remnant is challenging, as the data on safety of repeated procedures is limited. This study set out to evaluate the risks for morbidity, mortality, and complications after repeated operations, and to compare those to primary operations.

methodsRetrospective observational two-center study on consecutive patients undergoing microsurgical tumor resection. The data derived from independent, prospective institutional registries. The primary endpoint was morbidity at 3 months (M3), defined as significant decrease on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Secondary endpoints were mortality, rate and severity of complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Grade (CDG).

results463/2403 (19.3%) were repeated procedures. Morbidity at M3 occurred in n = 290 patients (12.1%). In univariable analysis, patients undergoing repeated surgery were 98% as likely as patients undergoing primary surgery to experience morbidity (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72-1.34, p = 0.889). In multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, tumor size, histology and posterior fossa location, the relationship remained stable (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.90-1.73, p = 0.186). Mortality was n = 10 (0.4%) at discharge and n = 95 (4.0%) at M3, without group differences. At least one complication occurred in n = 855, and the rate (35.5% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.892) and severity (CDG; p = 0.520) was similar after primary and repeated procedures. Results were reproduced in subgroup analyses for meningiomas, gliomas and cerebral metastases.

conclusionsRepeated surgery for intracranial tumors does not increase the risk of morbidity. Mortality, and both the rate and severity of complications are comparable to primary operations. This information is of value for patient counseling and the informed consent process.

Indexed as

CraniotomyAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesReoperationRetrospective StudiesBrain tumorComplicationsCraniotomyMorbidityMortalityReoperation

Identifiers

PMID30474767
PMCPMC6399174
OpenAlexW2901231119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.