Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474706›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Outcome and safety of rechallenge [

Anna Yordanova, Paula Linden, Stefan Hauser, Michael Meisenheimer, Stefan Kürpig, Georg Feldmann, Florian C Gaertner, Markus Essler, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Guideline
  4. The Prostate · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Phase 2 Prospective Trial of Retreatment with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  9. Observational
  10. PSMA-RECAP: [Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  11. Randomized Phase 2 Trial of an Extended and Flexible Dosing Schedule ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Use ofWiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy and safety of rechallenge [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna YordanovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Paula LindenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan HauserDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Michael MeisenheimerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan KürpigDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Georg FeldmannDepartment of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Florian C GaertnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Hojjat AhmadzadehfarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. hojjat.ahmadzadehfar@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData are sparse regarding the feasibility of radioligand therapy (RLT) with [ MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients who received rechallenge therapy at our department from January 2015 to March 2018 were assessed. Non-haematological and haematological adverse events were evaluated from laboratory data and clinical reports and were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v. 5.0). Time to prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) progression and the overall survival (OS) rate of the study patients were calculated from the date of the first rechallenge cycle. Furthermore, the OS calculated from the first cycle baseline PSMA-RLT was compared with the survival of patients who received only baseline PSMA-RLT. The response data were determined using [

resultsIncluded in this retrospective study were 30 patients who were initially treated with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-5) of PSMA-RLT and were eventually retreated after a median of 6 months (range 2-26). Each patient received a median of 3 (range 1-6) rechallenge cycles. None of the patients experienced a disabling or life-threatening grade 4 adverse event according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 8 patients (27%). Serious adverse events included leucopoenia (n = 2), neutropoenia (n = 1), anaemia (n = 4), thrombopenia (n = 4) and elevated renal parameters (n = 1). Irreversible adverse events occurred in 21 patients (70%). The permanent adverse events were mild/moderate (CTC grade 1/2) in 19 patients and serious (CTC grade 3) in two patients, respectively. According to PSA measurements, 75-90% of patients showed a benefit (response/stable) from the first 4 rechallenge cycles. The median OS was 12 months calculated from the first rechallenge cycle and 25 months calculated from the first cycle baseline PSMA-RLT. For comparison, the median OS in patients who received only baseline PSMA-RLT was 9 months. The difference according to the logrank test was significant: p value <0.001. Patients with a PSA decrease after the first cycle of rechallenge PSMA-RLT survived a median of 19 months, while patients with a PSA increase survived only 6 months.

conclusionRechallenge prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) therapy has an acceptable safety profile. The majority of the retreated patients benefited from the rechallenge therapy. Patients who showed a biochemical response achieved a longer OS compared to patients who did not respond. The median OS was significantly longer in patients after rechallenge PSMA-RLT than in patients who received only baseline PSMA-RLT.

Indexed as

SafetyAgedAged, 80 and overDipeptidesFeasibility StudiesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansLigandsLutetiumMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisDipeptidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingLigandsLutetiumPluvictoProstate-Specific AntigenCRPCLutetium-177Prostate cancerPSMARadioligand therapyRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID30474706
OpenAlexW2901319364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.