Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474574›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2018

The relationship between a trusted adult and adolescent outcomes: a protocol of a scoping review.

Jan Pringle, Ross Whitehead, Dona Milne, Eileen Scott, John McAteer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Social Networks of Adolescent Sexual Violence Perpetrators: Peer Friendship and Trusted Adult Characteristics.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A mediational analysis of adverse experiences in childhood and quality of life in adulthood.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan PringleUniversity of Edinburgh, 9 Hope Park Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9NW, UK. jpringl2@exseed.ed.ac.uk.
Ross WhiteheadNHS Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Dona MilnePublic Health, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Eileen ScottNHS Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
John McAteerUniversity of Edinburgh, 9 Hope Park Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9NW, UK.
Public Health Scotland · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBNHS Lothian · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1Medical Research Council MR/KO 023209/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough documentation of harm towards children and young people has existed for centuries, it was not until the 1960s that it became a specific focus for health professionals. Since that time, the importance of protective social networks has become better understood. The concept of trusted adults has come into sharper focus, with children being encouraged to develop networks of dependable adults to turn to for support in times of need. While many child protection processes highlight risks to younger children, there has been less emphasis on older children. The role of trusted adults may be particularly important during adolescence, due to burgeoning independence, developing sexuality, relationship formation, and associated vulnerabilities. While important choices relating to health and education are made during this period, there is little formal evidence relating to the impact of trusted adults on such outcomes. This review therefore aims to focus on the role and influence of trusted adults for adolescents.

methodsThis study is a scoping review. A broad range of databases will be searched, including MEDLINE, ERIC, Education Abstracts, Web of Science, ASSIA, Sociological Abstracts, and PsycINFO. Predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria will be used, with a focus on outcomes relating to health and education. Two reviewers will blind screen papers independently at all screening stages, with conflicts being resolved by a third reviewer. Quantitative and qualitative studies, as well as unpublished (grey) literature/reports, will be included. We will use the World Health Organization's 'second decade' definition of adolescence. We aim to collate and map evidence in a broad overview and produce meta-analyses of homogenous data. Where this is not possible, a narrative summary will be produced. DISCUSSION: There appears to be sparse knowledge regarding the role of trusted adults for adolescents. Potential benefits to health and wellbeing may impact on educational attainment, and vice versa. These areas are of particular relevance during the second decade, when decisions that affect future direction, achievement, and wellbeing are being made. The increased understanding of the role of trusted adults provided by this review may help to inform practice and policy and lead to potential benefits for the health and education of adolescents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 42017076739.

Indexed as

Health StatusInterpersonal RelationsSocial SupportTrustAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorEducational StatusHarm ReductionHealth PersonnelHumansMental HealthScoping Reviews as TopicAdolescentsEducational statusHarm reductionHealth statusScoping reviewSocial support

Identifiers

PMID30474574
PMCPMC6260676
OpenAlexW2901814843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.