Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30474447›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of general practice2019

Clinical leadership and integrated primary care: A systematic literature review.

Minke S Nieuwboer, Rob van der Sande, Marjolein A van der Marck, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Marieke Perry

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of general practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minke S Nieuwboera Department of Geriatric Medicine , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud UMC Alzheimer Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Rob van der Sanded Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Marjolein A van der Marcka Department of Geriatric Medicine , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud UMC Alzheimer Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Marcel G M Olde Rikkertb Department of Geriatric Medicine , Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Marieke Perrya Department of Geriatric Medicine , Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud UMC Alzheimer Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLHAN University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeaders are needed to address healthcare changes essential for implementation of integrated primary care. What kind of leadership this needs, which professionals should fulfil this role and how these leaders can be supported remains unclear.

objectivesTo review the literature on the effectiveness of programmes to support leadership, the relationship between clinical leadership and integrated primary care, and important leadership skills for integrated primary care practice.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO until June 2018 for empirical studies situated in an integrated primarycare setting, regarding clinical leadership, leadership skills, support programmes and integrated-care models. Two researchers independently selected relevant studies and critically appraised studies on methodological quality, summarized data and mapped qualitative data on leadership skills.

resultsOf the 3207 articles identified, 56 were selected based on abstract and title, from which 20 met the inclusion criteria. Selected papers were of mediocre quality. Two non-controlled studies suggested that leadership support programmes helped prepare and guide leaders and positively contributed to implementation of integrated primary care. There was little support that leaders positively influence implementation of integrated care. Leaders' relational and organizational skills as well as process-management and change-management skills were considered important to improve care integration. Physicians seemed to be the most adequate leaders.

conclusionGood quality research on clinical leadership in integrated primary care is scarce. More profound knowledge is needed about leadership skills, required for integrated-care implementation, and leadership support aimed at developing these skills.

Indexed as

LeadershipDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansPhysiciansPrimary Health CareProfessional CompetencegeneralGeneral practice/family medicineintegrated careskills trainingsystematic reviews and meta-analyses

Identifiers

PMID30474447
PMCPMC6394325
OpenAlexW2902051476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.