Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30473990›Full record

ArticleCurrent trauma reports2018

The current status of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury.

Angelos G Kolias, Edoardo Viaroli, Andres M Rubiano, Hadie Adams, Tariq Khan, Deepak Gupta, Amos Adeleye, Corrado Iaccarino, Franco Servadei, Bhagavatula Indira Devi and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current trauma reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hinge craniotomy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a narrative review and national survey among Mexican neurosurgeons.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Traumatic brain injury].Der Nervenarzt · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Angelos G KoliasDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Edoardo ViaroliDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Service of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland.
Andres M RubianoNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hadie AdamsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tariq KhanNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Deepak GuptaNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Amos AdeleyeNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Corrado IaccarinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Franco ServadeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Bhagavatula Indira DeviNIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter J HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital & University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INHumanitas University · ITOspedale di Parma · ITUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan · NGUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Department of Health 12/35/57Department of Health HTA/12/35/57Department of Health HTA/13/15/02Department of Health II-C5-0715-20005Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0502030Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G0601025Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review describes the evidence base that has helped define the role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). RECENT

findingsThe publication of two randomized trials (DECRA and RESCUEicp) has strengthened the evidence base. The DECRA trial showed that neuroprotective bifrontal DC for moderate intracranial hypertension is not helpful, whereas the RESCUEicp trial found that last-tier DC for severe and refractory intracranial hypertension can significantly reduce the mortality rate but is associated with a higher rate of disability. These findings have reopened the debate about 1) the indications for DC in various TBI subtypes, 2) alternative techniques (e.g. hinge craniotomy), 3) optimal time and material for cranial reconstruction, and 4) the role of shared decision-making in TBI care. Additionally, the role of primary DC when evacuating an acute subdural hematoma is currently undergoing evaluation in the context of the RESCUE-ASDH randomized trial. SUMMARY: This review provides an overview of the current evidence base, discusses its limitations and presents a global perspective on the role of DC, as there is growing recognition that attention should also focus on low- and middle-income countries due to their much greater TBI burden.

Indexed as

cisternostomycranioplastydecompressionneurosurgeryneurotrauma

Identifiers

PMID30473990
PMCPMC6244550
OpenAlexW2889511815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.