Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30473802›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2018

Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls.

Michael Doube, Alessandro A Felder, Melissa Y Chua, Kalyani Lodhia, Michał M Kłosowski, John R Hutchinson, Sandra J Shefelbine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SegmentGeometry: A Tool for Measuring Second Moment of Area in 3D Slicer.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael DoubeDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8021-8127
Alessandro A FelderSkeletal Biology Group, The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-9906
Melissa Y ChuaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Kalyani LodhiaSkeletal Biology Group, The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK.
Michał M KłosowskiDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
John R HutchinsonStructure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-7038
Sandra J ShefelbineDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4011-9044
Royal Veterinary College · GBImperial College London · GBNortheastern University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F000863/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F001169/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone adaptation is modulated by the timing, direction, rate and magnitude of mechanical loads. To investigate whether frequent slow, or infrequent fast, gaits could dominate bone adaptation to load, we compared scaling of the limb bones from two mammalian herbivore clades that use radically different high-speed gaits, bipedal hopping (suborder Macropodiformes; kangaroos and kin) and quadrupedal galloping (order Artiodactyla; goats, deer and kin). Forelimb and hindlimb bones were collected from 20 artiodactyl and 15 macropod species (body mass

Indexed as

anatomyArtiodactylabipedal hoppingboneMacropodiformesscaling

Identifiers

PMID30473802
PMCPMC6227981
OpenAlexW2953259060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.