Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30473706›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2018

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Metastasis: A Registry Study.

Florian Kurtz, Florian Struller, Philipp Horvath, Wiebke Solass, Hans Bösmüller, Alfred Königsrainer, Marc A Reymond

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03210298 (Multicenter, International Online Documentation of Indications and Results of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03210298 unknown statusnot on this map

Multicenter, International Online Documentation of Indications and Results of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC Und PITAC) for Treating Malignant Peritoneal and Pleural Diseases

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSabine RhodeRan2016 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsPeritoneum Cancer, Peritoneum Neoplasm, Pleural Cancer, Pleural EffusionArmsPIPAC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions: a narrative review of the literature from an oncologist's perspective.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Florian KurtzDept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Florian StrullerDept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp HorvathDept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Wiebke SolassInstitute of Pathology, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Hans BösmüllerInstitute of Pathology, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Alfred KönigsrainerDept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.
Marc A ReymondDept. of General Surgery, Karls-Eberhard University Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-6237
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery system with superior pharmacological properties for treating peritoneal metastasis (PM). Safety and efficacy results of PIPAC with cisplatin/doxorubicin or oxaliplatin from a registry cohort are presented.

methodsIRB-approved registry study. Retrospective analysis. No predefined inclusion criteria, individual therapeutic recommendation by the interdisciplinary tumor board. Safety assessment with CTCAE 4.0. Histological assessment of tumor response by an independent pathologist using the 4-tied peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS). Mean PRGS and ascites volume were assessed at each PIPAC.

resultsA total of 142 PIPAC procedures were scheduled in 71 consecutive patients with PM from gastric (

conclusionPIPAC is feasible, safe, and well-tolerated and can induce histological regression in a significant proportion of pretreated PM patients. This trial is registered with NCT03210298.

Identifiers

PMID30473706
PMCPMC6220392
OpenAlexW2898330049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.