ArticleEnvironment international2019
A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE.
Article in Environment international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 67 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
130 citing papers in PubMed, 67 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exposure to particulate matters and risk of diabetes-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of the number of remaining teeth on the risk of frailty: a meta-analysis.Odontology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk of Ischemic Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack in Patients Receiving Comprehensive Versus Noncomprehensive Diagnostic Workup: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Pooled it
- Plant-based diets and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Association of feeding and parenting styles with adiposity in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Nutritional status, body composition and chemotherapy dosing in children and young people with cancer: a systematic review by the SIOP nutrition network.British journal of cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Electronic cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking in young people: A systematic review.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Risks of colorectal and extracolonic cancers following colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Pooled it
- Increased Prevalence of Periapical Lesions in Osteoporosis Patients: A Systematic Review.European endodontic journal · 2025Pooled it
- Factors associated with prehospital and in-hospital delays in acute ischaemic stroke care in Indonesia: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.Environment international · 2025Pooled it
- Association between DDT or its byproducts and T2DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Nurse Burnout and Patient Safety, Satisfaction, and Quality of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of longitudinal studies on the association between cluster of health-related behaviors and tooth loss among adults.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Physical activity and pain in people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Matter and Mortality: An Update of the WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of public health · 2024Pooled it
- Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.Current environmental health reports · 2023Pooled it
70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to explain how to apply, interpret, and present the results of a new instrument to assess the risk of bias (RoB) in non-randomized studies (NRS) dealing with effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes. This instrument is modeled on the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) instrument. The RoB instrument for NRS of exposures assesses RoB along a standardized comparison to a randomized target experiment, instead of the study-design directed RoB approach. We provide specific guidance for the integral steps of developing a research question and target experiment, distinguishing issues of indirectness from RoB, making individual-study judgments, and performing and interpreting sensitivity analyses for RoB judgments across a body of evidence. Also, we present an approach for integrating the RoB assessments within the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of the evidence in the systematic review. Finally, we guide the reader through an overall assessment to support the rating of all domains that determine the certainty of a body of evidence using the GRADE approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.