Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30472824›Full record

ArticleAsian spine journal2019

Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis-"Redefined".

Amarnath Chellathurai, Balaji Ayyamperumal, Rajakumari Thirumaran, Gopinathan Kathirvelu, Priya Muthaiyan, Sivakumar Kannappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spinal Dysraphisms: A New Anatomical-Clinicoradiological Classification.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Segmental Spinal Dysgenesis.Ochsner journal · 2020
    Article
  10. Atypical Variants of Spinal Dysraphism: A Case Series.Journal of the West African College of Surgeons
    Article
  11. An Unusual Case of a Conus Hanging by a Thread.Journal of pediatric neurosciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amarnath ChellathuraiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.
Balaji AyyamperumalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.
Rajakumari ThirumaranDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.
Gopinathan KathirveluDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, India.
Priya MuthaiyanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.
Sivakumar KannappanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective single institutional observational study. PURPOSE: Segmental spinal dysgenesis (SSD), a complex spinal dysraphic state caused by notochord malformation disorders, is named after its morphological presentation where a spine segment is dysgenetic, malformed or absent. This study's objective was to examine and reassess SSD imaging findings and correlate them with an embryological explanation. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Scott and his colleagues defined SSD as segmental agenesis or dysgenesis of the lumbar or thoracolumbar vertebrae and underlying spinal cord. Tortori-Donati and his colleagues defined it as a morphologic continuum ranging from hypoplasia to an absent spinal cord segment.

methodsFifteen children, whose imaging findings and clinical features were consistent with SSD, were included in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed per institutional spine protocol.

resultsFive children (33.3%) presented with a high-ending bulbous cord with no caudal segment, six (40%) presented with a dorsal or lumbar segmental dysgenetic cord with a low-lying, bulky caudal cord but without significant spinal canal narrowing, and four (26.6%) presented with segmental caudal dysgenesis with severe kyphoscoliosis, gibbus deformity, and spinal canal narrowing with a normal distal segment (normal or low-lying).

conclusionsSSD is a complex spinal anomaly in children requiring clinical-radiological assessment followed by multidisciplinary management based on the extent and severity of the dysgenetic cord and the type of SSD. MRI plays a crucial role in both diagnosing and classifying SSD prior to surgical treatment to prevent further impairment.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingScoliosisSegmental spinal dysgenesisSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID30472824
PMCPMC6454287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.