Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30472694›Full record

ArticleIET systems biology2018

Hierarchical parameter estimation of GRN based on topological analysis.

Wei Zhang, Feng Zhang, Jianming Zhang, Ning Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IET systems biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei ZhangDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Road 38, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Road 38, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianming ZhangDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Road 38, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. jmzhang@iipc.zju.edu.cn.
Ning WangDepartment of Control Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Road 38, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse engineering of gene regulatory network (GRN) is an important and challenging task in systems biology. Existing parameter estimation approaches that compute model parameters with the same importance are usually computationally expensive or infeasible, especially in dealing with complex biological networks.In order to improve the efficiency of computational modeling, the paper applies a hierarchical estimation methodology in computational modeling of GRN based on topological analysis. This paper divides nodes in a network into various priority levels using the graph-based measure and genetic algorithm. The nodes in the first level, that correspond to root strongly connected components(SCC) in the digraph of GRN, are given top priority in parameter estimation. The estimated parameters of vertices in the previous priority level ARE used to infer the parameters for nodes in the next priority level. The proposed hierarchical estimation methodology obtains lower error indexes while consuming less computational resources compared with single estimation methodology. Experimental outcomes with insilico networks and a realistic network show that gene networks are decomposed into no more than four levels, which is consistent with the properties of inherent modularity for GRN. In addition, the proposed hierarchical parameter estimation achieves a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID30472694
PMCPMC8687294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.