Observational studyArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2020
Accuracy of real-time delivery room resuscitation documentation.
Observational study in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consent-driven, semi-automated data collection during birth and newborn resuscitation: Insights from the NewbornTime study.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Video recording in the delivery room: current status, implications and implementation.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Oxygen saturation after birth in resuscitated neonates in Uganda: a video-based observational study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Observational
- Effectiveness of reflective learning in skill-based teaching among postgraduate anesthesia students: An outcome-based study using video annotation tool.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021Article
- Placental transfusion and short-term outcomes among extremely preterm infants.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2021Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the accuracy of real-time delivery room resuscitation documentation.
designRetrospective observational study.
settingLevel 3 academic neonatal intensive care unit.
participantsFifty infants with video recording of neonatal resuscitation.
main outcome measuresVital sign assessments and interventions performed during resuscitation. The accuracy of written documentation was compared with video gold standard.
resultsTiming of initial heart rate assessment agreed with video in 44/50 (88%) records; the documented heart rate was correct in 34/44 (77%) of these. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were documented at 5 min of life in 90% of resuscitations. Of these, 100% of heart rate and 93% of oxygen saturation values were correctly recorded. Written records accurately reflected the mode(s) of respiratory support for 89%-100%, procedures for 91%-100% and medications for 100% of events.
conclusionReal-time documentation correctly reflects interventions performed during delivery room resuscitation but is less accurate for early vital sign assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.