Trial reportJournal of the American College of Surgeons2019
Optimization of Second Window Indocyanine Green for Intraoperative Near-Infrared Imaging of Thoracic Malignancy.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04752137 (Evaluation of Intraoperative Tumor Margin Identification With Fluorescent Dye Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Intraoperative Tumor Margin Identification With Fluorescent Dye Imaging
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiinstitutional Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Lung Cancer.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021Trial
- Intraoperative Molecular Imaging in Thoracic Oncology: Expanding the Observable Disease Space.Cancers · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Nodule Localization in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Existing and Emerging Techniques.Cancers · 2026Review
- Precision at the Margin: Innovations and Challenges in Intraoperative Molecular Imaging for Thoracic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Near-Infrared Imaging in Small Animal Surgical Oncology: Current Applications and Future Directions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Real-time quantification during indocyanine green fluorescent-guided surgery in canine soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Lighting the path: a narrative review of non-molecular intraoperative lung imaging modalities.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Burn Depth using Indocyanine Green: Discrepancies Between Macroscopic Visualization and the Microenvironment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Investigating the mechanisms of indocyanine green tumour uptake in sarcoma cell lines and ex vivo human tissue.The Journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Review
- Affordable Small Molecules as Promising Fluorescent Labels for Biomolecules.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advantages and rational application of indocyanine green fluorescence in pulmonary nodule surgery: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Progression in Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Technology for Lung Cancer Management.Biosensors · 2024Review
- Mechanisms of delayed indocyanine green fluorescence and applications to clinical disease processes.Surgery · 2024Review
- Dose Optimization of Intravenous Indocyanine Green for Malignant Lung Tumor Localization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative Study of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Lung Cancer with Near-Infrared-I/II Windows.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Surgery.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- Feasibility and safety of computed tomography-guided intrapulmonary injection of indocyanine green for localization of peripheral pulmonary ground-glass nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Original and liposome-modified indocyanine green-assisted fluorescence study with animal models.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNear-infrared (NIR) imaging using the second time window of indocyanine green (ICG) allows localization of pulmonary, pleural, and mediastinal malignancies during surgery. Based on empirical evidence, we hypothesized that different histologic tumor types fluoresce optimally at different ICG doses. STUDY
designPatients with thoracic tumors biopsy-proven or suspicious for malignancy were enrolled in an NIR imaging clinical trial. Patients received a range of ICG doses 1 day before surgery: 1 mg/kg (n = 8), 2 mg/kg (n = 8), 3 mg/kg (n = 13), 4 mg/kg (n = 8), and 5 mg/kg (n = 8). Intraoperatively, NIR imaging was performed. The endpoint was to identify the highest tumor-to-background fluorescence ratio (TBR) for each tumor type at each dose. Final pathology confirmed tumor histology.
resultsOf 45 patients, 41 had malignancies (18 non-small cell lung cancers [NSCLC], 3 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, 13 thoracic metastases, 4 thymomas, 3 mesotheliomas). At doses of 4 to 5 mg/kg, the TBR from primary NSCLC vs other malignancies was no different (2.70 vs 3.21, p = 1.00). At doses of 1 to 3 mg/kg, the TBR was greater for the NSCLCs (3.19 vs 1.49, p = 0.0006). Background fluorescence from the heart or ribs was observed in 1 of 16 cases at 1 to 2 mg/kg, 5 of 13 cases at 3 mg/kg, and 14 of 16 cases at 4 to 5 mg/kg; this was a major determinant of dose optimization.
conclusionsThis is the first study to demonstrate that the optimal NIR contrast agent dose varies by tumor histology. Lower dose ICG (2 to 3 mg/kg) is superior for nonprimary lung cancers, and high dose ICG (4 to 5 mg/kg) is superior for lung cancers. This will have major implications as more intraoperative imaging trials surface in other specialties, will significantly reduce costs and may facilitate wider application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.