ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2019
Sampling arterial input function (AIF) from peripheral arteries: Comparison of a temporospatial-feature based method against conventional manual method.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is often difficult to accurately localize small arteries in images of peripheral organs, and even more so with vascular abnormality vasculatures, including collateral arteries, in peripheral artery disease (PAD). This poses a challenge for manually sampling arterial input function (AIF) in quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI data of peripheral organs. In this study, we designed a multi-step screening approach that utilizes both the temporal and spatial information of the dynamic images, and is presumably suitable for localizing small and unpredictable peripheral arteries. In 41 DCE MRI datasets acquired from human calf muscles, the proposed method took <5 s on average for sampling AIF for each case, much more efficient than the manual sampling method; AIFs by the two methods were comparable, with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.983 ± 0.004 (p-value < 0.01) and relative difference of 2.4% ± 2.6%. In conclusion, the proposed temporospatial-feature based method enables efficient and accurate sampling of AIF from peripheral arteries, and would improve measurement precision and inter-observer consistency for quantitative DCE MRI of peripheral tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.