Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470917›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2019

Assessment of spatial learning and memory in the Barnes maze task in rodents-methodological consideration.

Kinga Gawel, Ewa Gibula, Marta Marszalek-Grabska, Joanna Filarowska, Jolanta H Kotlinska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kinga GawelDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University, Jaczewskiego 8b, 20-090, Lublin, Poland. kingagawel@umlub.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-8857-847X
Ewa GibulaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University, Chodzki 4a, 20-093, Lublin, Poland.
Marta Marszalek-GrabskaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University, Jaczewskiego 8b, 20-090, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2487-9131
Joanna FilarowskaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University, Chodzki 4a, 20-093, Lublin, Poland.
Jolanta H KotlinskaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University, Chodzki 4a, 20-093, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-1515

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie 1/MN/WFS/2016/2017Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie DS 22/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the methods valuable for assessing spatial learning and memory impairments in rodents, the Barnes maze (BM) task deserves special attention. It is based on the assumption that the animal placed into the aversive environment should learn and remember the location of an escape box located below the surface of the platform. Different phases of the task allow to measure spatial learning, memory retrieval, and cognitive flexibility. Herein, we summarize current knowledge about the BM procedure, its variations and critical parameters measured in the task. We highlight confounding factors which should be taken into account when conducting BM task, discussing briefly its advantages and disadvantages. We then propose an extended version of the BM protocol which allows to measure different aspects of spatial learning and memory in rodents. We believe that this review will help to standardize the BM methodology across the laboratories and eventually make the results comparable.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalMaze LearningMemoryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHumansMemory DisordersRodentiaApparatusBarnes mazeProcedureProtocolRodentsSpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID30470917
PMCPMC6311199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.