ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2019
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation for improved characterization of human plasma lipoproteins.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inventive HDL Mimicking Nanoparticles: A Promising Frontier in Cardiovascular Disease Management.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Development of an advanced separation and characterization platform for mRNA and lipid nanoparticles using multi-detector asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Optimized AF4 combined with density cushion ultracentrifugation enables profiling of high-purity human blood extracellular vesicles.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2024Article
- Enhancing Extracellular Vesicle Analysis by Integration of Large-Volume Sample Stacking in Capillary Electrophoresis with Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Field-Flow Fractionation in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Recombinant protein linker production as a basis for non-invasive determination of single-cell yeast age in heterogeneous yeast populations.RSC advances · 2021Article
- HDL-small RNA Export, Transport, and Functional Delivery in Atherosclerosis.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation as a multifunctional technique for the characterization of polymeric nanocarriers.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021Review
- The Difference Between High Density Lipoprotein Subfractions and Subspecies: an Evolving Model in Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- Characterization of human plasma lipoproteins using anion exchange fast protein liquid chromatography and targeted mass spectrometry assay.Proteomics · 2021Article
- Enrichment of plasma extracellular vesicles for reliable quantification of their size and concentration for biomarker discovery.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High- and low-density lipoproteins (HDL and LDL) are attractive targets for biomarker discovery. However, ultracentrifugation (UC), the current methodology of choice for isolating HDL and LDL, is tedious, requires large sample volume, results in sample loss, and does not readily provide information on particle size. In this work, human plasma HDL and LDL are separated and collected using semi-preparative asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (SP-AF4) and UC. The SP-AF4 and UC separation conditions, sample throughput, and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) lipidomic results are compared. Over 600 μg of total proteins is recovered in a single SP-AF4 run, and Western blot results confirm apoA1 pure and apoB100 pure fractions, consistent with HDL and LDL, respectively. The SP-AF4 separation requires ~ 60 min per sample, thus providing a marked improvement over UC which can span hours to days. Lipidome analysis of SP-AF4-prepared HDL and LDL fractions is compared to UC-prepared HDL and LDL samples. Over 270 lipids in positive MS mode and over 140 lipids in negative MS mode are identified by both sample preparation techniques with over 98% overlap between the lipidome. Additionally, lipoprotein size distributions are determined using analytical scale AF4 coupled with multiangle light scattering (MALS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) detectors. These developments position SP-AF4 as a sample preparation method of choice for lipoprotein biomarker characterization and identification. Graphical abstract ᅟ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.