Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470875›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2019

Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when?

Hartmut Goldschmidt, John Ashcroft, Zsolt Szabo, Laurent Garderet

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Presalvage International Staging System Stage and Other Important Outcome Associations in CD34Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Availability of pharmacological treatments for multiple myeloma in Spain.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rising Prevalence of Low-FrequencyCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Hartmut GoldschmidtInternal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. hartmut.goldschmidt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
John AshcroftDepartment of Haematology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.
Zsolt SzaboClinical Development, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
Laurent GarderetINSERM, UMR_S 938, Proliferation and Differentiation of Stem Cells, Paris, 75012, France.
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematological malignancies, affecting mainly elderly patients. The treatment landscape for the management of this disease has evolved significantly over the past 15 years, and a vast array of therapeutics is now available, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. As a result, deciding which drugs to use and when, and whether these should be used in a particular order or combination, can be challenging. Although combination regimens are often associated with deeper responses and better long-term outcomes than monotherapy, and are becoming the standard of care, they may result in significant incremental toxicity; hence, a sequential approach may be more appropriate for some patients. In particular, treatment choices can vary depending on whether the patient has newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, is eligible for transplant, has relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, or is considered to have high-risk disease. In this review, we discuss factors to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in each of these settings. We also briefly discuss possible therapeutic strategies involving agents that may become available in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansImmunologic FactorsMultiple MyelomaProteasome InhibitorsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsImmunologic FactorsProteasome InhibitorsCombination therapyMultiple myelomaSequential therapyTreatment regimen

Identifiers

PMID30470875
PMCPMC6334731
OpenAlexW2900691306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.