Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The utility of urinary CD80 as a diagnostic marker in patients with renal diseases.

Shogo Minamikawa, Kandai Nozu, Shingo Maeta, Tomohiko Yamamura, Keita Nakanishi, Junya Fujimura, Tomoko Horinouchi, China Nagano, Nana Sakakibara, Hiroaki Nagase and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. PD-1/CD80Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biomarkers in pediatric glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shogo MinamikawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kandai NozuDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. nozu@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Shingo MaetaSysmex Corporation, Technology Development, Elemental Technology Development 2, Kobe, Japan.
Tomohiko YamamuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Keita NakanishiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Junya FujimuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Tomoko HorinouchiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
China NaganoDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Nana SakakibaraDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hiroaki NagaseDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hideaki ShimaSysmex Corporation, Technology Development, Elemental Technology Development 2, Kobe, Japan.
Kenta NodaSysmex Corporation, Technology Development, Elemental Technology Development 2, Kobe, Japan.
Takeshi NinchojiDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hiroshi KaitoDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kazumoto IijimaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe University · JPSysmex (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD80, which regulates T cell activation, may provide a differential diagnostic marker between minimal change disease (MCD) and other renal diseases, including focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS). However, recent reports show contrasting results. Therefore, we evaluated the utility of urinary CD80 as a diagnostic biomarker. We collected 65 urine samples from 55 patients with MCD (n = 31), FSGS (n = 4), inherited nephrotic syndrome (n = 4), Alport syndrome (n = 5) and other glomerular diseases (n = 11), and control samples (n = 30). We measured urinary CD80 levels by ELISA. Urinary CD80 (ng/gCr) (median, interquartile range) levels were significantly higher in patients with MCD in relapse (91.5, 31.1-356.0), FSGS (376.2, 62.7-1916.0), and inherited nephrotic syndrome (220.1, 62.9-865.3), than in patients with MCD in remission (29.5, 21.7-52.8) (p < 0.05). Elevation of urinary CD80 was observed, even in patients with inherited nephrotic syndrome unrelated to T cell activation. Additionally, urinary CD80 was positively correlated with urinary protein levels. Our results suggest that urinary CD80 is unreliable as a differential diagnostic marker between MCD in relapse and FSGS or inherited kidney diseases. Increased urinary CD80 excretion was present in all patients with active kidney disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultB7-1 AntigenBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHumansInfantKidney DiseasesMaleNephrosis, LipoidNephrotic SyndromeRecurrenceB7-1 AntigenBiomarkersCD80 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30470792
PMCPMC6251900
OpenAlexW2901284627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.