Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470786›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2019

Diagnosis and management of urinary extravasation after high-grade renal trauma.

Sorena Keihani, Ross E Anderson, James M Hotaling, Jeremy B Myers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sorena KeihaniDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. sorena.keihani@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-5809
Ross E AndersonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
James M HotalingDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jeremy B MyersDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal trauma research has historically focused on parenchymal injuries and the risk of bleeding. However, much less is known about the diagnosis and optimal management of urinary extravasation, which complicates ~30% of high-grade renal injuries. Immediate or delayed ureteral stenting is the most common procedure used to treat collecting system injuries when intervention is needed. However, the lack of evidence-based guidelines leaves the diagnosis and management of urinary extravasation largely dependent upon physicians' experience, initial and follow-up imaging protocols, and the definitions used for grading the injuries. The knowledge gaps in the management of urinary extravasation that need to be addressed include the timing of excretory-phase CT imaging, patterns of clinically significant urinary extravasation, predictors of complications when urinary extravasation occurs, protocols for obtaining and interpreting follow-up imaging, and the role of ureteral stenting and other interventions in management. To improve the management of urinary extravasation after high-grade renal trauma, large, multi-institutional prospective trails assessing different diagnostic and therapeutic protocols are needed.

Indexed as

HumansInjury Severity ScoreKidney Tubules, CollectingUrinomaWounds, NonpenetratingWounds, Penetrating

Identifiers

PMID30470786
OpenAlexW2900766754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.