Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470767›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Proof of concept study of mass cytometry in septic shock patients reveals novel immune alterations.

Morgane Gossez, Thomas Rimmelé, Thibault Andrieu, Sophie Debord, Frédérique Bayle, Christophe Malcus, Françoise Poitevin-Later, Guillaume Monneret, Fabienne Venet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prediction of outcome using CD14Medical microbiology and immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Circulating mitochondrialProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Morgane GossezHospices Civils de Lyon, Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France. morgane.gossez@chu-lyon.fr.
Thomas RimmeléEA 7426 "Pathophysiology of Injury-Induced Immunosuppression - PI3", Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1/bioMérieux/Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Thibault AndrieuUniv Lyon, SFR Biosciences, ENS de Lyon, Inserm US8, CNRS UMS344, UCBL, Lyon, France.
Sophie DebordHospices Civils de Lyon, Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Frédérique BayleHospices Civils de Lyon, Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine Department, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Christophe MalcusHospices Civils de Lyon, Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Françoise Poitevin-LaterHospices Civils de Lyon, Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Guillaume MonneretHospices Civils de Lyon, Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Fabienne VenetHospices Civils de Lyon, Immunology Laboratory, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative single cell technologies such as mass cytometry (CyTOF) widen possibilities to deeply improve characterisation of immune alterations mechanisms in human diseases. So far, CyTOF has not been used in sepsis - a condition characterized by complex immune disorders. Here, we evaluated feasibility of CyTOF analysis in patients with septic shock. We designed a mass cytometry panel of 25 extracellular markers to study mononuclear cells from 5 septic shock patients and 5 healthy donors. We explored single-cell data with global and specific unsupervised approaches such as heatmaps, SPADE and viSNE. We first validated relevance of our CyTOF results by highlighting established immune hallmarks of sepsis, such as decreased monocyte HLA-DR expression and increased expressions of PD1 and PD-L1 on CD4 T cells and monocytes. We then showed that CyTOF analysis reveals novel aspects of sepsis-induced immune alterations, e.g. B cell shift towards plasma cell differentiation and uniform response of several monocyte markers defining an immune signature in septic patients. This proof of concept study demonstrates CyTOF suitability to analyse immune features of septic patients. Mass cytometry could thus represent a powerful tool to identify novel pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic targets for immunotherapy in septic shock patients.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesFemaleFlow CytometryHLA-DR AntigensHumansLymphocyte ActivationMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesProof of Concept StudyShock, SepticSingle-Cell AnalysisT-LymphocytesB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkersCD274 protein, humanHLA-DR Antigens

Identifiers

PMID30470767
PMCPMC6251894
OpenAlexW2900842645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.