Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

AutoFoci, an automated high-throughput foci detection approach for analyzing low-dose DNA double-strand break repair.

Nicor Lengert, Johanna Mirsch, Ratna N Weimer, Eik Schumann, Peter Haub, Barbara Drossel, Markus Löbrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Repair of DNA double-strand breaks after low radiation doses in childhood cancer survivors and matched cancer-free individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Foci-Xpress: Automated and Fast Nuclear Foci Counting Tool.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicor LengertTheory of Complex Systems, Darmstadt University of Technology, Hochschulstr. 6, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany. nicor@fkp.tu-darmstadt.de.
Johanna MirschRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstr. 13, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.
Ratna N WeimerRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstr. 13, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.
Eik SchumannRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstr. 13, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany.
Peter HaubImage Consulting, 68804, Altlußheim, Germany.
Barbara DrosselTheory of Complex Systems, Darmstadt University of Technology, Hochschulstr. 6, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany.
Markus LöbrichRadiation Biology and DNA Repair, Darmstadt University of Technology, Schnittspahnstr. 13, 64287, Darmstadt, Germany. lobrich@bio.tu-darmstadt.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GRK1657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal DNA damages induced by ionising radiation (IR) and their efficient repair is crucial to limit genomic instability. The cellular DSB response after low IR doses is of particular interest but its examination requires the analysis of high cell numbers. Here, we present an automated DSB quantification method based on the analysis of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci as markers for DSBs. We establish a combination of object properties, combined in the object evaluation parameter (OEP), which correlates with manual object classification. Strikingly, OEP histograms show a bi-modal distribution with two maxima and a minimum in between, which correlates with the manually determined transition between background signals and foci. We used algorithms to detect the minimum, thus separating foci from background signals and automatically assessing DSB levels. To demonstrate the validity of this method, we analyzed over 600.000 cells to verify results of previous studies showing that DSBs induced by low doses are less efficiently repaired compared with DSBs induced by higher doses. Thus, the automated foci counting method, called AutoFoci, provides a valuable tool for high-throughput image analysis of thousands of cells which will prove useful for many biological screening approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutomationCell CycleCells, CulturedDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairFibroblastsHistonesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiation, IonizingSoftwareTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DNA-Binding ProteinsH2AX protein, humanHistonesTP53BP1 protein, humanTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID30470760
PMCPMC6251879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.