Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470737›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Energy landscape underlying spontaneous insertion and folding of an alpha-helical transmembrane protein into a bilayer.

Wei Lu, Nicholas P Schafer, Peter G Wolynes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Light-Activated Assembly of Connexon Nanopores in Synthetic Cells.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Untangling the complexity of membrane protein folding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei LuCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, 77005, TX, USA.
Nicholas P SchaferCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, 77005, TX, USA.
Peter G WolynesCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, 77005, TX, USA. pwolynes@rice.edu.

Funding

CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF THE PROTEIN FOLDING PROBLEMR01GM044557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI WOLYNES, PETER GUY · 1990 to 2018
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane protein folding mechanisms and rates are notoriously hard to determine. A recent force spectroscopy study of the folding of an α-helical membrane protein, GlpG, showed that the folded state has a very high kinetic stability and a relatively low thermodynamic stability. Here, we simulate the spontaneous insertion and folding of GlpG into a bilayer. An energy landscape analysis of the simulations suggests that GlpG folds via sequential insertion of helical hairpins. The rate-limiting step involves simultaneous insertion and folding of the final helical hairpin. The striking features of GlpG's experimentally measured landscape can therefore be explained by a partially inserted metastable state, which leads us to a reinterpretation of the rates measured by force spectroscopy. Our results are consistent with the helical hairpin hypothesis but call into question the two-stage model of membrane protein folding as a general description of folding mechanisms in the presence of bilayers.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingCell MembraneKineticsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein Structure, SecondaryThermodynamicsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30470737
PMCPMC6251876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.