ArticleJMIR mental health2018
Real-World Technology Use Among People With Mental Illnesses: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of Digital Mental Health Technologies in the United States: Systematic Literature Review and Framework Synthesis.JMIR mental health · 2024Pooled it
- Determinants of Digital Health Resource Utilization Among Individuals With Self-Reported Bipolar Disorder in Germany-A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Andersen Model.Bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- Supporting the Individualized Use of Digital Tools in Community Mental Health: The Technology Specialist Pilot Study.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Remote Monitoring and Virtual Appointments for the Assessment and Management of Depression via the Co-HIVE Model of Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Co-design Process of a Digital Return-to-Work Solution for People With Common Mental Disorders: Stakeholder Perception Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Mental Health Intent Recognition for Arabic-Speaking Patients Using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and BERT Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- mHealth Solutions for Perinatal Mental Health: Scoping Review and Appraisal Following the mHealth Index and Navigation Database Framework.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2022Article
- Individualized Intervention to Support Mental Health Recovery Through Implementation of Digital Tools into Clinical Care: Feasibility Study.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Advancing Health Equity in Digital Mental Health: Lessons From Medical Anthropology for Global Mental Health.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Experience of Peer Bloggers Using a Social Media Website for Adolescents With Depression or Anxiety: Proof-of-Concept Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Role of a Digital Return-To-Work Solution for Individuals With Common Mental Disorders: Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Three Stakeholder Groups.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
- Apps With Maps-Anxiety and Depression Mobile Apps With Evidence-Based Frameworks: Systematic Search of Major App Stores.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
- Digital navigators to implement smartphone and digital tools in care.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2020Article
- Promoting meaningful recovery with digital mental health care.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2020Article
- Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2020Review
- Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Review
- Predicting engagement with an online psychosocial intervention for psychosis: Exploring individual- and intervention-level predictors.Internet interventions · 2019Article
- Mental Health Apps in Psychiatric Treatment: A Patient Perspective on Real World Technology Usage.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- Use of Mobile and Computer Devices to Support Recovery in People With Serious Mental Illness: Survey Study.JMIR mental health · 2019Article
- The technology specialist: a 21st century support role in clinical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing interest in using technology-based tools to support mental health recovery. Yet, despite evidence suggesting widespread access to technology among people with mental illnesses, interest in using technology to support mental health, and effectiveness of technology-based tools developed by researchers, such tools have not been widely adopted within mental health settings. Little is currently known about how mental health consumers are using technology to address mental health needs in real-world settings outside of controlled research studies.
objectiveThis qualitative study examined current practices and orientations toward technology among consumers in 3 mental health settings in the United States.
methodsEthnographic observations and semistructured interviews were conducted. Observations focused on if and how technology was salient within the setting and documented relevant behaviors, interactions, and dialogue in fieldnotes. Ethnographic data informed the development of a semistructured interview that inquired into technology use and interest among consumers (n=15) in a community mental health setting. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were reviewed and coded by multiple researchers. Key concepts and patterns identified were refined by the research team to develop the main findings.
resultsOwnership of technology, although common, was not ubiquitous and was varied across the sites. Participants had varying levels of awareness regarding the key capabilities of modern technologies. Participants used technology for many purposes, but there was limited evidence of technology use to support mental health. Technology-based tools specific to mental health were not routinely used, although some participants found widely available mobile apps to be helpful in recovery.
conclusionsQualitative findings suggest that many, but not all, clients will be interested in using technology to support mental health needs. The variability in type and quality of technology owned by participants suggests the need to design for a range of functionality in the development of mental health tools. Findings also suggest thinking broadly about using existing platforms and widely available tools to support consumers in mental health recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.