Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470239›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

Preconception counselling for low health literate women: an exploration of determinants in the Netherlands.

Mirjam P Fransen, Miriam E Hopman, Laxsini Murugesu, Ageeth N Rosman, Sian K Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preconception Care in a Remote Aboriginal Community Context: What, When and by Whom?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirjam P FransenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.p.fransen@amc.uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9937-7024
Miriam E HopmanAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laxsini MurugesuAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ageeth N RosmanRotterdam University of Applied Sciences, School for Healthcare Studies, Department of Master Physician Assistant Midwifery, Rochussenstraat 198, 3015, EK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sian K SmithThe University of New South Wales, Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Lowy Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
GGD Amsterdam · NLRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

ZonMw 209040006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen from lower socioeconomic groups tend to be at greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, but are less likely to participate in preconception counselling compared to higher socioeconomic groups. This could be partly because of their limited skills to assess, understand and use health related information in ways that promote and maintain good health (health literacy skills). In this study we explored determinants of participation in preconception counselling among women with low health literacy in The Netherlands.

methodsPotential determinants of participation in preconception counselling were derived from the literature, and mapped onto a theoretical framework, which was tested for perceived relevance and completeness in an expert review (n = 20). The framework was used to prepare face-to-face interviews with women with low health literacy and a wish to conceive (n = 139). In the interviews we explored preconception counselling awareness, knowledge, considerations, subjective norms, self-efficacy, attitude, and intention. Linear regression analyses were used to test associations with intention to participate in preconception counselling.

resultsMost women (75%) were unaware of the concept of preconception counselling and the provision of counselling, even if they lived in areas where written invitations had been disseminated. Common considerations for participation were: preparation for pregnancy; perceived lack of information; and problems in a previous pregnancy. Considerations not to participate were mostly related to perceived sufficient knowledge and perceived low risk of perinatal problems. Respondents generally had a positive attitude towards participation in preconception counselling for themselves, and 41% reported that they would participate in preconception counselling.

conclusionWomen with low health literacy were generally unaware of the concept and provision of preconception counselling, but seemed to be interested in participation. Further research should investigate how to effectively reach and inform this group about preconception counselling. This knowledge is essential for evidence-based development of interventions to increase the accessibility and understanding of preconception counselling.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCounselingFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansNetherlandsPatient Education as TopicPreconception CarePregnancySelf EfficacyWomen's HealthYoung AdultDeterminantsExpert reviewHealth literacyPreconception counsellingTheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID30470239
PMCPMC6251122
OpenAlexW2901435806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.