Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470200›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Factors influencing the quality of life of pregnant women: a systematic review.

Nolwenn Lagadec, Magali Steinecker, Amar Kapassi, Anne Marie Magnier, Julie Chastang, Sarah Robert, Nadia Gaouaou, Gladys Ibanez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nolwenn LagadecDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Magali SteineckerDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Amar KapassiDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Anne Marie MagnierDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Julie ChastangDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Sarah RobertSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), F75012, Paris, France.
Nadia GaouaouDepartment of Education and Research in General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, 27, rue Chaligny - 75571, cedex 12, Paris, France.
Gladys IbanezSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP UMRS 1136), F75012, Paris, France. gladys.ibanez@upmc.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5592-699X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a period of transition with important physical and emotional changes. Even in uncomplicated pregnancies, these changes can affect the quality of life (QOL) of pregnant women, affecting both maternal and infant health. The objectives of this study were to describe the quality of life during uncomplicated pregnancy and to assess its associated socio-demographic, physical and psychological factors in developed countries.

methodsA systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Searches were made in PubMed, EMBASE and BDSP (Public Health Database). Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Countries with a human development index over 0.7 were selected. The quality of the articles was evaluated on the basis of the STROBE criteria.

resultsIn total, thirty-seven articles were included. While the physical component of QOL decreased throughout pregnancy, the mental component was stable and even showed an improvement during pregnancy. Main factors associated with better QOL were mean maternal age, primiparity, early gestational age, the absence of social and economic problems, having family and friends, doing physical exercise, feeling happiness at being pregnant and being optimistic. Main factors associated with poorer QOL were medically assisted reproduction, complications before or during pregnancy, obesity, nausea and vomiting, epigastralgia, back pain, smoking during the months prior to conception, a history of alcohol dependence, sleep difficulties, stress, anxiety, depression during pregnancy and sexual or domestic violence.

conclusionsHealth-related quality of life refers to the subjective assessment of patients regarding the physical, mental and social dimensions of well-being. Improving the quality of life of pregnant women requires better identification of their difficulties and guidance which offers assistance whenever possible.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleQuality of LifeAbdominal PainAlcoholismAnxietyBack PainDepressionExerciseFemaleGestational AgeHappinessHumansMaternal AgeNauseaObesityOptimismHealth-related quality of lifeMeasurementPregnancyPrimary careQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30470200
PMCPMC6251086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.