Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30470171›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2018

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of cluster headache: early UK clinical experience.

Juana Marin, Nicola Giffin, Elizabeth Consiglio, Candace McClure, Eric Liebler, Brendan Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Cluster Headache: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  7. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuromodulation for Headache Management in Pregnancy.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the cervical vagus nerve in rare primary headaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The trigeminal pathways.Journal of neurology · 2022
    Review
  16. Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  17. Psychedelics in the Treatment of Headache and Chronic Pain Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juana MarinWellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 9PJ, UK. jcmarin@hotmail.co.uk.
Nicola GiffinRoyal United Hospital, Coombe Park, Bath, BA1 3NG, UK.
Elizabeth ConsiglioInterface Clinical Services, Gate Way Drive, Yeadon, Leeds, LS19 7XY, UK.
Candace McClureNorth American Science Associates, Inc., 400 US-169, Minneapolis, MN, 55441, USA.
Eric LieblerelectroCore, Inc., 150 Allen Road, Suite 201, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Brendan DaviesUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6QG, UK.

Funding

electroCore, Inc. Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence supports the use of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) as a promising therapeutic option for patients with cluster headache (CH). We conducted this audit of real-world data from patients with CH, the majority of whom were treatment refractory, to explore early UK clinical experience with nVNS used acutely, preventively, or both.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed data from 30 patients with CH (29 chronic, 1 episodic) who submitted individual funding requests for nVNS to the National Health Service. All patients had responded to adjunctive nVNS therapy during an evaluation period (typical duration, 3-6 months). Data collected from patient interviews, treatment diaries, and physician notes were summarised with descriptive statistics. Paired t tests were used to examine statistical significance.

resultsThe mean (SD) CH attack frequency decreased from 26.6 (17.1) attacks/wk. before initiation of nVNS therapy to 9.5 (11.0) attacks/wk. (P < 0.01) afterward. Mean (SD) attack duration decreased from 51.9 (36.7) minutes to 29.4 (28.5) minutes (P < 0.01), and mean (SD) attack severity (rated on a 10-point scale) decreased from 7.8 (2.3) to 6.0 (2.6) (P < 0.01). Use of abortive treatments also decreased. Favourable changes in the use of preventive medication were also observed. No serious device-related adverse events were reported.

conclusionsSignificant decreases in attack frequency, severity, and duration were observed in these patients with CH who did not respond to or were intolerant of multiple preventive and/or acute treatments. These real-world findings complement evidence from clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and safety of nVNS in CH.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesicsCluster HeadacheCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomVagus Nerve StimulationYoung AdultAnalgesicsAcute treatmentChronic cluster headacheNeuromodulationNon-invasive vagus nerve stimulationPreventive therapyReal-world dataRefractory

Identifiers

PMID30470171
PMCPMC6755582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.