Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30469484›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2018

Evidence for Right-Sided Horses Being More Optimistic than Left-Sided Horses.

Isabell Marr, Kate Farmer, Konstanze Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Does Carrying a Rider Change Motor and Sensory Laterality in Horses?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  10. Non-invasive stress evaluation in domestic horses (Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  11. Horses' (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabell MarrDepartment Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nuertingen, Germany. marri@stud.hfwu.de.
Kate FarmerSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South Street, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland KY16 9JP, UK. katefarmer@utanet.at.
Konstanze KrügerDepartment Equine Economics, Faculty Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622 Nuertingen, Germany. konstanze.Krueger@hfwu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9120-680X

Funding

Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg till now no grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's positive or negative perspective when judging an ambiguous stimulus (cognitive bias) can be helpful when assessing animal welfare. Emotionality, as expressed in approach or withdrawal behaviour, is linked to brain asymmetry. The predisposition to process information in the left or right brain hemisphere is displayed in motor laterality. The quality of the information being processed is indicated by the sensory laterality. Consequently, it would be quicker and more repeatable to use motor or sensory laterality to evaluate cognitive bias than to perform the conventional judgment bias test. Therefore, the relationship between cognitive bias and motor or sensory laterality was tested. The horses (

Indexed as

cognitive biashorsejudgment tasklateralitymotoroptimismpessimismsensory

Identifiers

PMID30469484
PMCPMC6315450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.