Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30468708›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Time of catheter removal in candidemia and mortality.

Marcio Nucci, Paula Rocha Braga, Simone A Nouér, Elias Anaissie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mortality ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiology and Clinical Features ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unresolved issues in the diagnosis of catheter related candidemia: A position paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  13. A Case of Central Venous Catheter-RelatedMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A longitudinal study of Candida bloodstream infections in a Japanese university hospital: species distribution, drug susceptibility, clinical features, and mortality predictors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Mortality-associated factors of candidemia: a multi-center prospective cohort in Turkey.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Observational
  19. Prognostic factors ofLancet regional health. Americas · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcio NucciUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Hospital Universitário, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: mnucci@hucff.ufrj.br.
Paula Rocha BragaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Hospital Universitário, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Simone A NouérUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Hospital Universitário, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Elias AnaissieCTI - Clinical Trial & Consulting, Cincinnati, USA.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRClinical Trial and Consulting · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of central venous catheter (CVC) removal on the outcome of patients with candidemia is controversial, with studies reporting discrepant results depending on the time of CVC removal (early or any time during the course of candidemia).

objectiveEvaluate the effect of time to CVC removal, early (within 48h from the diagnosis of candidemia) vs. removal at any time during the course of candidemia, on the 30-day mortality.

methodsRetrospective cohort study of 285 patients with candidemia analyzing CVC removal within 48h (first analysis) or at any time (second analysis).

resultsA CVC was in place in 212 patients and was removed in 148 (69.8%), either early (88 patients, 41.5%) or late (60 patients, 28.3%). Overall, the median time to CVC removal was one day (range 1-28) but was six days (range 3-28) for those removed later. In the first analysis, APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR] 1.111, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.066-1.158), removal at any time (OR 0.079, 95% CI 0.021-0.298) and Candida parapsilosis infection (OR 0.291, 95% CI 0.133-0.638) were predictors of 30-day mortality. Early removal was not significant. In the second analysis APACHE II score (OR 1.122, 95% CI 1.071-1.175) and C. parapsilosis infection (OR 0.247, 95% CI 0.103-0.590) retained significance.

conclusionsThe impact of CVC removal is dependent on whether the optimal analysis strategy is deployed and should be taken into consideration in future analyses.

Indexed as

Device RemovalHospital MortalityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHECandidemiaCatheterization, Central VenousChildCross InfectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCandidaCandidemiaCentral venous catheterMortalityMultivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID30468708
PMCPMC9425687
OpenAlexW2900739509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.