Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467993›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research2018

Uterine natural killer cells: To protect and to nurture.

Dorothy K Sojka, Liping Yang, Wayne M Yokoyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Changes in the Gut Microbiome and Pathologies in Pregnancy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Human-Induced CD49aFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. How I Manage Natural Killer Cell Deficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2020
    Article
  12. Collagen at the maternal-fetal interface in human pregnancy.International journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Single-cell technologies in reproductive immunology.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Uterine Natural Killer Cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorothy K SojkaRheumatology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-4123
Liping YangRheumatology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Wayne M YokoyamaRheumatology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-7264

Funding

ORIGINS AND FUNCTIONS OF UTERINE NATURAL KILLER CELLS IN PREGNANCYR01AI140397 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YOKOYAMA, WAYNE M. · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the course of pregnancy, the maternal-fetal interface is tightly regulated and undergoes dynamic changes that promote the successful development of the semi-allogeneic fetus. In response to embryo implantation, the uterus remodels with maternal immune cells occupying the maternal-fetal interface and uterine natural killer (uNK) cells becoming the most prominent leukocyte. Recently, uNK cells have been discovered to be heterogeneous, including conventional NK and tissue-resident NK cells. Here, we will review the recent advances in uNK cell biology and discuss their functional mechanisms which protect and nurture the growing fetus.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetusHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMaternal-Fetal ExchangePregnancyUterusconventional natural killer cellspregnancytissue-resident natural killer cellsuterine natural killer cells

Identifiers

PMID30467993
PMCPMC6309490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.