Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467792›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

The experience of providing hospice care concurrent with cancer treatment in the VA.

Leah M Haverhals, Chelsea E Manheim, Vincent Mor, Mary Ersek, Bruce Kinosian, Karl A Lorenz, Katherine E Faricy-Anderson, Risha A Gidwani-Marszowski, Cari Levy

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care: A Scoping Review and Directions for Future Nursing Research.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Leah M HaverhalsRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Aurora, CO, USA. leah.haverhals@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-5491
Chelsea E ManheimRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Aurora, CO, USA.
Vincent MorCenter of Innovation, Providence Veterans Health Administration (VA) Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Mary ErsekCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bruce KinosianCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karl A LorenzCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Katherine E Faricy-AndersonCenter of Innovation, Providence Veterans Health Administration (VA) Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Risha A Gidwani-MarszowskiCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Cari LevyRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Aurora, CO, USA.
Brown University · USDenver VA Medical Center · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USNational Measurement Laboratory · AUPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Can Concurrent Hospice Care and Cancer Treatment Achieve Superior Outcomes?I01HX000956 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOR, VINCENT · 2013 to 2013
–
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development 11R 12-121HSRD VA I01 HX000956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVeterans with advanced cancer can receive hospice care concurrently with treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy. However, variations exist in concurrent care use across Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers (VAMCs), and overall, concurrent care use is relatively rare. In this qualitative study, we aimed to identify, describe, and explain factors that influence the provision of concurrent cancer care (defined as chemotherapy or radiation treatments provided with hospice) for veterans with terminal cancer.

methodsFrom August 2015 to April 2016, we conducted six site visits and interviewed 76 clinicians and staff at six VA sites and their contracted community hospices, including community hospices (n = 16); VA oncology (n = 25); VA palliative care (n = 17); and VA inpatient hospice and palliative care units (n = 18).

resultsThematic qualitative content analysis found three themes that influenced the provision of concurrent care: (1) clinicians and staff at community hospices and at VAs viewed concurrent care as a viable care option, as it preserved hope and relationships while patient goals are clarified during transitions to hospice; and (2) the presence of dedicated liaisons facilitated care coordination and education about concurrent care; however, (3) clinicians and staff concerns about Medicare guideline compliance hindered use of concurrent care.

conclusionsWhile concurrent care is used by a small number of veterans with advanced cancer, VA staff valued having the option available and as a bridge to hospice. Hospice staff felt concurrent care improved care coordination with VAMCs, but use may be tempered due to concerns related to Medicare compliance.

Indexed as

VeteransAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical PathwaysFemaleHospice and Palliative Care NursingHospice CareHospicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePalliative CareQualitative ResearchCancerConcurrent careHospicePalliative careVeterans

Identifiers

PMID30467792
PMCPMC6391175
OpenAlexW2901351046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.