Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467778›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Cone beam versus multi-detector computed tomography for detecting hearing loss.

Mathilde Debeaupte, Ruben Hermann, Jean-Baptiste Pialat, Amanda Martinon, Eric Truy, Aicha Ltaief Boudrigua

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01771393 (Performance of Cone-beam Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01771393 nacompletednot on this map

Performance of Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CT) Compared to Multidetector CT for Arthrography of the Wrist, Ankle, Elbow and Knee

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2012 to 2013Enrolled69ConditionsCartilage Ulceration of the Distal JointsArmsCBCT prior to MDCT, MDCT prior to CBCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathilde DebeaupteDepartment of ENT, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69 003, Lyon, France. mathildedeb@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0981-9042
Ruben HermannDepartment of ENT, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69 003, Lyon, France.
Jean-Baptiste PialatDepartment of Radiology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Amanda MartinonDepartment of Radiology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Eric TruyDepartment of ENT, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69 003, Lyon, France.
Aicha Ltaief BoudriguaDepartment of Radiology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is equivalent or superior to that of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) for the radiological assessment of conductive hearing loss with intact tympanic membrane in adults. Evaluation of inter- and intraobserver variability and measurement of the radiation dosimetry associated with each technique were secondary objectives. STUDY

designProspective, single-center study.

methodsTen adults were included from April to June 2013. All patients underwent MDCT and CBCT with reconstruction of temporal bones. Two radiologists with ENT experience reviewed the results twice. Diagnostic agreement between MDCT and CBCT and inter- and intraobserver agreement was evaluated with the kappa statistic. Comparisons of dosimetry were evaluated by calculating the ratio of the CT dose index (CTDI) between MDCT and CBCT.

resultsDiagnostic agreement between MDCT and CBCT was satisfactory (kappa = 0.69). Inter- and intraobserver agreement was also acceptable, and the average ratio of the CTDI of MDCT and CBCT was 4.01.

conclusionCBCT is a reliable method that uses a low dose of radiation to investigate conductive hearing loss with intact tympanic membrane in adults. Its relevance and potential superiority to MDCT in diagnosing middle ear pathologies such as otosclerosis remain to be demonstrated, but the preliminary data are promising.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultFemaleHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiometryTemporal BoneConductive hearing lossCone beamDiagnostic reliabilityTemporal bone

Identifiers

PMID30467778
OpenAlexW2901433408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.