Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467760›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019

Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: an update.

A Franco-Moreno, L Cabezón-Gutiérrez, M Palka-Kotlowsa, M Villamayor-Delgado, M García-Navarro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retrospective Review of Prescribing Patterns in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Single Center Experience in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Franco-MorenoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Torrejón University Hospital, Mateo Inurria, s/n (Soto del Henares), 28850, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain. aifranco@torrejonsalud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-3893
L Cabezón-GutiérrezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Torrejón University Hospital, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
M Palka-KotlowsaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Torrejón University Hospital, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
M Villamayor-DelgadoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Torrejón University Hospital, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
M García-NavarroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Torrejón University Hospital, Mateo Inurria, s/n (Soto del Henares), 28850, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario de Torrejón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism of four to sixfold. Cancer-related interventions such as chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and indwelling central venous catheters also increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. Low molecular weight heparin for at least 3-6 months is the current standard of care for the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulation should be continued as long as the cancer is active. Over the past few years, direct oral anticoagulants have emerged, including one direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran etexilate) and three factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban). In the randomized controlled trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants with vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulants all provide non-inferior in prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and in acute coronary syndrome. In people with cancer, these drugs have emerged as attractive alternatives for the treatment of venous thromboembolism with the potential to overcome the limitations of low molecular weight heparin. Randomized controlled studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants to low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients are still limited and direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended for the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism yet. However, new emerging data are supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated thrombosis. Here, we review recent data on the evidence related to the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombosisVenous ThromboembolismVitamin KAnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightVitamin KAnticoagulant therapyCancer-associated thrombosisClinical trialDirect oral anticoagulantLow molecular weight heparinVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID30467760
OpenAlexW2900864013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.