ArticleParasitology research2019
Comparison of different staining methods for determination of viability on Mesocestoides vogae tetrathyridia.
Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel activation-related gene P158 is essential for evagination and early development of Echinococcus multilocularis protoscoleces.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Repurposing statins for the treatment of larval cestodiases:Parasitology · 2025Article
- Albendazole specifically disrupts microtubules and protein turnover in the tegument of the cestode Mesocestoides corti.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- The potential for histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as cestocidal drugs.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesocestoides vogae is widely employed as a model for studying the biology, differentiation, and experimental chemotherapy of cestodes. Currently, there are few techniques to measure the viability of M. vogae metacestodes during pharmacological experiments. The aim of the present work was to evaluate and compare different staining techniques to determine objectively the viability of M. vogae tetrathyridia. Eosin (0.05% w/v), methylene blue (0.01% w/v), propidium iodide (PI, 2 μg/ml), and fluorescein diacetate (FDA, 0.5 μg/ml) solutions were tested against live, heat-killed (cultivated at 65 °C for 2 h) and thymol-treated tetrathyridia (50 and 250 μg/ml). Parasites were counted under a dissecting microscope or a fluorescence compound microscope, as appropriate. Studies by scanning electron microscope were performed to compare the ultrastructural damage with the viability of parasites. After comparing the performance of different dyes, we chose the eosin staining technique because its simplicity, rapidity, sensitivity, low cost and fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30467616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.