Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467593›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Pulmonary and respiratory muscle function in response to 10 marathons in 10 days.

Nicholas B Tiller, Louise A Turner, Bryan J Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lung Diffusion in a 14-Day Swimming Altitude Training Camp at 1850 Meters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas B TillerAcademy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK. n.tiller@shu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-658X
Louise A TurnerAcademy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Bryan J TaylorSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMarathon and ultramarathon provoke respiratory muscle fatigue and pulmonary dysfunction; nevertheless, it is unknown how the respiratory system responds to multiple, consecutive days of endurance exercise.

methodsNine trained individuals (six male) contested 10 marathons in 10 consecutive days. Respiratory muscle strength (maximum static inspiratory and expiratory mouth-pressures), pulmonary function (spirometry), perceptual ratings of respiratory muscle soreness (Visual Analogue Scale), breathlessness (dyspnea, modified Borg CR10 scale), and symptoms of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (URTI), were assessed before and after marathons on days 1, 4, 7, and 10.

resultsGroup mean time for 10 marathons was 276 ± 35 min. Relative to pre-challenge baseline (159 ± 32 cmH

conclusionsSingle-stage marathon provokes acute expiratory muscle fatigue which may have implications for health and/or performance, but 10 consecutive days of marathon running does not elicit cumulative (chronic) changes in respiratory function or perceptions of dyspnea. These data allude to the robustness of the healthy respiratory system.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedMuscle FatiguePhysical EnduranceRespirationRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory MusclesRunningVital CapacityEnduranceFatigueLung functionUltramarathon

Identifiers

PMID30467593
OpenAlexW2901119409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.