Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467589›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2019

A review of the 10/66 dementia research group.

A Matthew Prina, Rosie Mayston, Yu-Tzu Wu, Martin Prince

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beneficial Effect of Societal Factors on APOE-ε2 and ε4 Carriers' Brain Health: A Systematic Review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Bibliometric analysis of Alzheimer's and dementia research in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evidence paradox: Enhancing clinical trials for older adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Social determinants of health but not global genetic ancestry predict dementia prevalence in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. The Influence of Education and Occupation Type on Birth Cohort Differences in Cognitive Function of Mexican Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Factors associated with longer hospital admission in elderly patients with major neurocognitive disorder.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A Matthew PrinaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Health Service, King's College London, London, UK. matthew.prina@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6698-3263
Rosie MaystonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Health Service, King's College London, London, UK.
Yu-Tzu WuInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Health Service, King's College London, London, UK.
Martin PrinceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Health Service, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 340755Medical Research Council MR/K021907/1Us Alzheimer's Association IIRG-04-1286Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust GR066133Wellcome Trust GR08002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this review we discuss how the study of dementia epidemiology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) has changed in the last 20 years, and specifically to review the evidence created by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group (DRG) and discuss future directions for research.

methodsWe identified and collated all the papers related to the 10/66 Dementia Research Group, including papers from groups who adopted the 10/66 methodology, that have been published in peer-reviewed journals.

resultsOver 200 papers including data from Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean were identified by this review. Many of the findings revolved around the epidemiology of dementia, mental health and non-communicable diseases, including the cross-cultural development and validation of measurement tools of cognition and functioning, need for care, care arrangements and mental health. Social ageing, care dependence and caregiver interventions were also topics that the group had published on. DISCUSSION: A body of evidence has been generated that has challenged the view, prevalent when the group started, that dementia is comparatively rare in LMICs. The experience of the 10/66 DRG has shown that descriptive epidemiological research can be important and impactful, where few data exist. Monitoring population trends in the prevalence and incidence of dementia may be our best chance to confirm hypotheses regarding modifiable risk factors of dementia.

Indexed as

AfricaAsiaCaribbean RegionDementiaDeveloping CountriesEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceLatin AmericaMalePovertyPrevalenceRisk FactorsAgeingDementiaEpidemiologyLMICMental health

Identifiers

PMID30467589
PMCPMC6336743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.