Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467401›Full record

ArticleHeredity2019

Ejaculate sperm number compensation in stalk-eyed flies carrying a selfish meiotic drive element.

Lara C Meade, Deidre Dinneen, Ridhima Kad, Dominic M Lynch, Kevin Fowler, Andrew Pomiankowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A meiotic driver alters sperm form and function in house mice: a possible example of spite.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Ancient gene drives: an evolutionary paradox.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Description of the karyotype ofComparative cytogenetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lara C MeadeDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5724-7413
Deidre DinneenDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Ridhima KadDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Dominic M LynchDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Kevin FowlerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andrew PomiankowskiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. ucbhpom@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-8755

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/F500351/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/I017909/1Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/G00563X/1Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/R010579/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic drive genes cause the degeneration of non-carrier sperm to bias transmission in their favour. Males carrying meiotic drive are expected to suffer reduced fertility due to the loss of sperm and associated harmful side-effects of the mechanisms causing segregation distortion. However, sexual selection should promote adaptive compensation to overcome these deleterious effects. We investigate this using SR, an X-linked meiotic drive system in the stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. Despite sperm destruction caused by drive, we find no evidence that SR males transfer fewer sperm to the female's spermathecae (long-term storage organs). Likewise, migration from the spermathecae to the ventral receptacle for fertilisation is similar for SR and wildtype male sperm, both over short and long time-frames. In addition, sperm number in storage is similar even after males have mated multiple times. Our study challenges conventional assumptions about the deleterious effects of drive on male fertility. This suggests that SR male ejaculate investment per ejaculate has been adjusted to match sperm delivery by wildtype males. We interpret these results in the light of recent theoretical models that predict how ejaculate strategies evolve when males vary in the resources allocated to reproduction or in sperm fertility. Adaptive compensation is likely in species where meiotic drive has persisted over many generations and predicts a higher stable frequency of drive maintained in wild populations. Future research must determine exactly how drive males compensate for failed spermatogenesis, and how such compensation may trade-off with investment in other fitness traits.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsDipteraFemaleMaleSex RatioSpermatozoaSperm CountX ChromosomeY Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID30467401
PMCPMC6781104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.