ArticleScientific reports2018
Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound on Liposomes Containing Channel proteins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the effects of cannabidiol encapsulation in liposomes on their physicochemical properties and biocompatibility.Drug delivery · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation with Ultrasound: Hypotheses on the Directionality of Effects and Community Resource.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Non-Drug and Non-Invasive Therapeutic Options in Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Force versus Response: Methods for Activating and Characterizing Mechanosensitive Ion Channels and GPCRs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Recent advancement of sonogenetics: A promising noninvasive cellular manipulation by ultrasound.Genes & diseases · 2024Review
- Applications of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Article
- A Comparative Feasibility Study for Transcranial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Effects of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) on Young Adults With Symptom of Depression: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Sustained acoustic medicine for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Low-Intensity Continuous Ultrasound Therapies—A Systematic Review of Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Ultrasound Parameter Optimization for Drug Delivery Applied to a Murine Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- Life with Bacterial Mechanosensitive Channels, from Discovery to Physiology to Pharmacological Target.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2020Review
- Transcranial Pulse Stimulation with Ultrasound in Alzheimer's Disease-A New Navigated Focal Brain Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Article
- Ultrasonic Neuromodulation and Sonogenetics: A New Era for Neural Modulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Recent developments in imaging of epilepsy.Current opinion in neurology · 2019Review
- A review on ultrasonic neuromodulation of the peripheral nervous system: enhanced or suppressed activities?Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to reversibly and non-invasively modulate region-specific brain activity in vivo suggests Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) as potential therapeutics for neurological dysfunctions such as epilepsy and Parkinson's disease. While in vivo studies provide evidence of the bioeffects of LIFU on neuronal activity, they merely hint at potential mechanisms but do not fully explain how this technology achieves these effects. One potential hypothesis is that LIFU produces local membrane depolarization by mechanically perturbing the neuronal cell membrane, or activating channels or other proteins embedded in the membrane. Proteins that sense mechanical perturbations of the membrane, such as those gated by membrane tension, are prime candidates for activating in response to LIFU and thus leading to the neurological responses that have been measured. Here we use the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL, which has been purified and reconstituted in liposomes, to determine how LIFU may affect the activation of this membrane-tension gated channel. Two bacterial voltage-gated channels, KvAP and NaK2K F92A channels were also studied. Surprisingly, the results suggest that ultrasound modulation and membrane perturbation does not induce channel gating, but rather induces pore formation at the membrane protein-lipid interface. However, in vesicles with high MscL mechanosensitive channel concentrations, apparent decreases in pore formation are observed, suggesting that this membrane-tension-sensitive protein may serve to increase the elasticity of the membrane, presumably because of expansion of the channel in the plane of the membrane independent of channel gating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.