Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30467220›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Differences in the Calculated Transvenous Pressure Drop between Chronic Hydrocephalus and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

G A Bateman, A R Bateman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G A BatemanFrom the Department of Medical Imaging (G.A.B.), John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia grant.bateman@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-9047
A R BatemanBiomedical Engineering (A.R.B.), University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-5344
John Hunter Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeChronic hydrocephalus is associated with dilated ventricles despite a normal intracranial pressure. In idiopathic intracranial hypertension, the ventricles are normal despite an elevated intracranial pressure. This apparent paradox has largely remained unexplained. It is suggested that a pressure difference between the superficial and deep venous territories of the brain could account for the variation between the 2 diseases. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the cause of this pressure difference. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing MR phase-contrast imaging, we calculated the hydraulic diameters of the sagittal and straight sinuses in 21 patients with hydrocephalus, 20 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 20 age-matched controls. The outflow resistance of each sinus was estimated using the Poiseuille equation. The outflow pressure was estimated using the flow data. A smaller subset of the patients with hydrocephalus had these studies repeated after successful shunt insertion.

resultsIn hydrocephalus, the sagittal sinuses were 21% smaller than those in controls (

conclusionsThere is a transvenous pressure difference in hydrocephalus that is absent in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. This difference is eliminated by shunt insertion. The findings may have a bearing on ventricular dilation.

Indexed as

AdultCranial SinusesFemaleHumansHydrocephalusIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedPseudotumor CerebriYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30467220
PMCPMC7048579
OpenAlexW2901352552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.