ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Who benefits more from an improved social health insurance? Evidence from supplementary high-cost illness insurance in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- How do economic capital, digital technology, and spatial structure drive health performance in the digital age? -An fsQCA study on provincial-level health resource utilization efficiency in China based on the TOE framework.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Medical insurance integration and rural-urban benefit disparities, 2006-2021: evidence from quasi-natural experiments in China.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Medical insurance integration and spatial effects in China: evidence from quasi-natural experiments and linked administrative data.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Health insurance and subjective well-being: evidence from integrating medical insurance across urban and rural areas in China.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Does the integration of urban and rural health insurance influence the functional limitations of the middle-aged and elderly in rural China?SSM - population health · 2023Article
- Article
- The impact of integrated urban and rural resident basic medical insurance on health service equity: Evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Interrupted time series analysis for the impact of integrated medical insurance on direct hospitalization expense of catastrophic illness.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Identifying patterns of clinical conditions among high-cost older adult health care users using claims data: a latent class approach.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Late career participation of late retirees in the age of the silver tsunami: understanding the influencing mechanism of health status and employment-based health insurance participation.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- An Empirical Study on the Inequality in Health and Healthcare in China's Medical Reform.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Trends in accessibility of negotiated targeted anti-cancer medicines in Nanjing, China: An interrupted time series analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effect of Health Insurance Policy on the Health Outcomes of the Middle-Aged and Elderly: Progress Toward Universal Health Coverage.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A positive association between hunger in childhood and frailty in old age: Findings from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- The benefits of an integrated social medical insurance for health services utilization in rural China: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Medical insurance and health equity in health service utilization among the middle-aged and older adults in China: a quantile regression approach.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Can the reform of integrating health insurance reduce inequity in catastrophic health expenditure? Evidence from China.International journal for equity in health · 2020Article
- Out-of-pocket expenses for myasthenia gravis patients in China: a study on patients insured by basic medical insurance in China, 2013-2015.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChina has recently made efforts to integrate urban and rural basic medical insurance systems in order to ensure both urban and rural enrollees obtain unified benefits. However, whether the distribution of government healthcare subsides has become more equitable remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze determinants of and inequality in net inpatient care benefits under the integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.
methodsData were obtained from a nationally representative household survey, the Fifth National Health Services Survey (2013), conducted in Anhui province. A multiple regression model and concentration index (CI) was used to estimate related factors and inequality of inpatient care net benefits.
resultsFindings indicated that individuals received more inpatient care benefits when urban and rural social healthcare systems were integrated. Factors associated with net benefits included gender, age, marital status, retirement, educational level, history of chronic diseases, health status, willingness to seek inpatient care and per capita income. The rich were found to disproportionately benefit from inpatient care, and the CI of net benefits for integrated insurance enrollees was the lowest among all three available health insurance schemes. These findings indicate that the recent unification of urban-rural social health insurances reduces inequality in net benefits from government subsidies. Some socioeconomic factors, such as per capita income, 60 years of age and over, history of chronic disease and high educational level positively influence inequality.
conclusionIn China, accelerating the integration of urban and rural medical insurance systems is an effective way to increase equity of benefit in urban and rural areas. Strategies aimed at reducing inpatient benefit inequality must address socioeconomic factors influencing healthcare outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.