SynthesisBMC health services research2018
Operationalizing the 'pragmatic' measures construct using a stakeholder feedback and a multi-method approach.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Determinants of Implementing Evidence-Based Trauma-Focused Interventions for Children and Youth: A Systematic Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Pooled it
- Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Toward criteria for pragmatic measurement in implementation research and practice: a stakeholder-driven approach using concept mapping.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- Rethinking barriers and facilitators in implementation science: conceptual, methodological, and practical challenges, and ways forward.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Self-report methods for the assessment of implementation determinants: Reflections on the CFIR user guide.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- Article
- Brain fog in Parkinson's disease: unraveling mechanisms and measuring impact.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- What do you think it means? Using cognitive interviewing to improve measurement in implementation science: description and case example.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Evaluating the pragmatic characteristics of advance care planning outcome measures in dementia clinical trials: A scoping review.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Psychometric evaluation of a pragmatic measure of clinical supervision as an implementation strategy.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Defining, conceptualizing and evaluating pragmatic qualities of quantitative instruments measuring implementation determinants and outcomes: a scoping and critical review of the literature and recommendations for future research.Translational behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.Implementation science : IS · 2022Review
- Development of the ASSESS tool: a comprehenSive tool to Support rEporting and critical appraiSal of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods implementation reSearch outcomes.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Integrating social determinants of health screening and referral during routine emergency department care: evaluation of reach and implementation challenges.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Strengthening methods for tracking adaptations and modifications to implementation strategies.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Cross-cultural adaption and psychometric investigation of the German version of the Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-36D).Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
- Optimizing Implementation in Cancer Control (OPTICC): protocol for an implementation science center.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Pragmatic measures for implementation research: development of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS).Translational behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- An updated protocol for a systematic review of implementation-related measures.Systematic reviews · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextImplementation science measures are rarely used by stakeholders to inform and enhance clinical program change. Little is known about what makes implementation measures pragmatic (i.e., practical) for use in community settings; thus, the present study's objective was to generate a clinical stakeholder-driven operationalization of a pragmatic measures construct. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The pragmatic measures construct was defined using: 1) a systematic literature review to identify dimensions of the construct using PsycINFO and PubMed databases, and 2) interviews with an international stakeholder panel (N = 7) who were asked about their perspectives of pragmatic measures. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Combined results from the systematic literature review and stakeholder interviews revealed a final list of 47 short statements (e.g., feasible, low cost, brief) describing pragmatic measures, which will allow for the development of a rigorous, stakeholder-driven conceptualization of the pragmatic measures construct.
conclusionsResults revealed significant overlap between terms related to the pragmatic construct in the existing literature and stakeholder interviews. However, a number of terms were unique to each methodology. This underscores the importance of understanding stakeholder perspectives of criteria measuring the pragmatic construct. These results will be used to inform future phases of the project where stakeholders will determine the relative importance and clarity of each dimension of the pragmatic construct, as well as their priorities for the pragmatic dimensions. Taken together, these results will be incorporated into a pragmatic rating system for existing implementation science measures to support implementation science and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.