Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30466040›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2019

Randomized controlled trial of telephone monitoring with psychiatry inpatients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders.

Christine Timko, Alex H S Harris, Mary Jannausch, Mark Ilgen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Dual Pathology: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of psychological research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine TimkoCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: ctimko@stanford.edu.
Alex H S HarrisCenter for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA; Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: Alexander.Harris2@va.gov.
Mary JannauschDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: mjann@med.umich.edu.
Mark IlgenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 4250 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: marki@med.umich.edu.

Funding

HSRD VA IAC 09-055HSRD VA RCS 00-001HSRD VA RCS 14-232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Psychiatry inpatients frequently have co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders, which are related to poor post-discharge outcomes. Telephone monitoring is effective in specialty substance use disorder treatment settings in increasing continuing care and 12-step program utilization and improving substance use outcomes. This study examined the effectiveness of telephone monitoring among psychiatry inpatients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. Methods This randomized controlled trial (n = 406) compared usual care to usual care plus telephone monitoring (one in-person session during the inpatient stay, followed by weekly telephone contact for three months post-discharge). Follow-ups were conducted at end-of-intervention (three months post-baseline) and nine and 15 months post-baseline (73% followed). Primary outcomes were number of days out of the past 30 of drinking alcohol, using drugs, and experiencing psychological problems. Secondary outcomes were outpatient substance use treatment, and 12-step group, utilization. Results Longitudinal modeling found that patients in both conditions improved over time on each primary outcome. Improvement was comparable between conditions on alcohol and drug use and psychological problems. Receipt of outpatient treatment decreased over the follow-up period and was not related to condition. Likelihood of attending 12-step group meetings did not change over follow-ups, and was not related to condition. Conclusions Improvement over time was evident regardless of condition assignment. Patients maintained attendance at 12-step groups from pre- to post-discharge. Short-term telephone monitoring in addition to usual care for patients with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders may not be sufficiently intensive to achieve additional improvements on outcomes.

Indexed as

TelephoneAdultAmbulatory CareComorbidityDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInpatientsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedPatient DischargePsychiatry12-Step groupsCo-occurringMental healthSubstance useTelephone monitoring

Identifiers

PMID30466040
PMCPMC6448768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.