ReviewActa biomaterialia2019
Methods for producing microstructured hydrogels for targeted applications in biology.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuning hydrogel properties and Schwann cell behavior through microchannel size control in magnetically templated hydrogels.Biomaterials science · 2026Article
- Architectural control of rod-coil block polypeptide thermoresponsive self-assemblyJournal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Lipidation alters the phase-separation of resilin-like polypeptides.Soft matter · 2024Article
- Modulating Phase Behavior in Fatty Acid-Modified Elastin-like Polypeptides (FAMEs): Insights into the Impact of Lipid Length on Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Phase Separation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Preparation of PEG/P(U-AM-ChCl) composite hydrogels using ternary DES light polymerization and their properties.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Inducing an LCST in hydrophilic polysaccharides via engineered macromolecular hydrophobicity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sequence-Encoded Differences in Phase Separation Enable Formation of Resilin-like Polypeptide-Based Microstructured Hydrogels.Biomacromolecules · 2023Article
- Phase separation and molecular ordering of the prion-like domain of the Arabidopsis thermosensory protein EARLY FLOWERING 3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Application of Thermoresponsive Intrinsically Disordered Protein Polymers in Nanostructured and Microstructured Materials.Macromolecular bioscience · 2021Review
- Synthetic biology as driver for the biologization of materials sciences.Materials today. Bio · 2021Review
- The role of gel wound dressings loaded with stem cells in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.American journal of translational research · 2021Review
- Design and Development of Hybrid Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications: Recent Trends in Anticancer Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Homeostasis and Systemic Diseases: Hypothesis, Evidences, and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications.Current opinion in chemical engineering · 2019Article
- Temperature-Controlled Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Disordered Proteins.ACS central science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogels have been broadly studied for applications in clinically motivated fields such as tissue regeneration, drug delivery, and wound healing, as well as in a wide variety of consumer and industry uses. While the control of mechanical properties and network structures are important in all of these applications, for regenerative medicine applications in particular, matching the chemical, topographical and mechanical properties for the target use/tissue is critical. There have been multiple alternatives developed for fabricating materials with microstructures with goals of controlling the spatial location, phenotypic evolution, and signaling of cells. The commonly employed polymers such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polypeptides, and polysaccharides (as well as others) can be processed by various methods in order to control material heterogeneity and microscale structures. We review here the more commonly used polymers, chemistries, and methods for generating microstructures in biomaterials, highlighting the range of possible morphologies that can be produced, and the limitations of each method. With a focus in liquid-liquid phase separation, methods and chemistries well suited for stabilizing the interface and arresting the phase separation are covered. As the microstructures can affect cell behavior, examples of such effects are reviewed as well. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Heterogeneous hydrogels with enhanced matrix complexity have been studied for a variety of biomimetic materials. A range of materials based on poly(ethylene glycol), polypeptides, proteins, and/or polysaccharides, have been employed in the studies of materials that by virtue of their microstructure, can control the behaviors of cells. Methods including microfluidics, photolithography, gelation in the presence of porogens, and liquid-liquid phase separation, are presented as possible strategies for producing materials, and their relative advantages and disadvantages are discussed. We also describe in more detail the various processes involved in LLPS, and how they can be manipulated to alter the kinetics of phase separation and to yield different microstructured materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.