Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465923›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2019

Methods for producing microstructured hydrogels for targeted applications in biology.

Cristobal Garcia Garcia, Kristi L Kiick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phase separation and molecular ordering of the prion-like domain of the Arabidopsis thermosensory protein EARLY FLOWERING 3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications.Current opinion in chemical engineering · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristobal Garcia GarciaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Kristi L KiickDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA; Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19176, USA; Delaware Biotechnology Institute, Newark, DE 19716, USA.

Funding

UDE COBRE: STRAINED MOLECULES FOR SYNTHESIS OF UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDSP20RR017716 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BEEBE, THOMAS PAUL · 2002 to 2011
$16.9M
Pilot Research Subproject ProgramP30GM110758 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI BEEBE, THOMAS PAUL · 2014 to 2018
$5.8M
Highly resilient, hydrophilic bioelastomers for engineering vocal fold tissueR01DC011377 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI KIICK, KRISTI L · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Cell Instructive Materials For Engineering Vascular GraftsR01HL108110 · NHLBI · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI AKINS, ROBERT E · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017716NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108110NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011377NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels have been broadly studied for applications in clinically motivated fields such as tissue regeneration, drug delivery, and wound healing, as well as in a wide variety of consumer and industry uses. While the control of mechanical properties and network structures are important in all of these applications, for regenerative medicine applications in particular, matching the chemical, topographical and mechanical properties for the target use/tissue is critical. There have been multiple alternatives developed for fabricating materials with microstructures with goals of controlling the spatial location, phenotypic evolution, and signaling of cells. The commonly employed polymers such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polypeptides, and polysaccharides (as well as others) can be processed by various methods in order to control material heterogeneity and microscale structures. We review here the more commonly used polymers, chemistries, and methods for generating microstructures in biomaterials, highlighting the range of possible morphologies that can be produced, and the limitations of each method. With a focus in liquid-liquid phase separation, methods and chemistries well suited for stabilizing the interface and arresting the phase separation are covered. As the microstructures can affect cell behavior, examples of such effects are reviewed as well. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Heterogeneous hydrogels with enhanced matrix complexity have been studied for a variety of biomimetic materials. A range of materials based on poly(ethylene glycol), polypeptides, proteins, and/or polysaccharides, have been employed in the studies of materials that by virtue of their microstructure, can control the behaviors of cells. Methods including microfluidics, photolithography, gelation in the presence of porogens, and liquid-liquid phase separation, are presented as possible strategies for producing materials, and their relative advantages and disadvantages are discussed. We also describe in more detail the various processes involved in LLPS, and how they can be manipulated to alter the kinetics of phase separation and to yield different microstructured materials.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsHydrogelsRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringAnimalsHumansHydrogelsHydrogelsLiquid-liquid phase separationMicrostructureResilinTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30465923
PMCPMC6326863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.