Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465865›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Flexible proton density (PD) mapping using multi-contrast variable flip angle (VFA) data.

Sara Lorio, Tim M Tierney, Amy McDowell, Owen J Arthurs, Antoine Lutti, Nikolaus Weiskopf, David W Carmichael

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TAnnals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Three-dimensional motion-corrected TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sara LorioUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: s.lorio@ucl.ac.uk.
Tim M TierneyWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Amy McDowellUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Owen J ArthursUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Antoine LuttiLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nikolaus WeiskopfDepartment of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
David W CarmichaelUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK; EPSRC / Wellcome Centre for Medical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, King's College, London, UK.
University College London · GBMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CHWellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2017-10-037Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-002Wellcome Trust 203148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative proton density (PD) maps measure the amount of free water, which is important for non-invasive tissue characterization in pathology and across lifespan. PD mapping requires the estimation and subsequent removal of factors influencing the signal intensity other than PD. These factors include the T1, T2* relaxation effects, transmit field inhomogeneities, receiver coil sensitivity profile (RP) and the spatially invariant factor that is required to scale the data. While the transmit field can be reliably measured, the RP estimation is usually based on image post-processing techniques due to limitations of its measurement at magnetic fields higher than 1.5 T. The post-processing methods are based on unified bias-field/tissue segmentation, fitting the sensitivity profile from images obtained with different coils, or on the linear relationship between T1 and PD. The scaling factor is derived from the signal within a specific tissue compartment or reference object. However, these approaches for calculating the RP and scaling factor have limitations particularly in severe pathology or over a wide age range, restricting their application. We propose a new approach for PD mapping based on a multi-contrast variable flip angle acquisition protocol and a data-driven estimation method for the RP correction and map scaling. By combining all the multi-contrast data acquired at different echo times, we are able to fully correct the MRI signal for T2* relaxation effects and to decrease the variance and the entropy of PD values within tissue class of the final map. The RP is determined from the corrected data applying a non-parametric bias estimation, and the scaling factor is based on the median intensity of an external calibration object. Finally, we compare the signal intensity and homogeneity of the multi-contrast PD map with the well-established effective PD (PD*) mapping, for which the RP is based on concurrent bias field estimation and tissue classification, and the scaling factor is estimated from the mean white matter signal. The multi-contrast PD values homogeneity and accuracy within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and deep brain structures are increased beyond that obtained using PD* maps. We demonstrate that the multi-contrast RP approach is insensitive to anatomical or a priori tissue information by applying it in a patient with extensive brain abnormalities and for whole body PD mapping in post-mortem foetal imaging.

Indexed as

ProtonsAdultAutopsyBrainChildEpilepsies, PartialFetusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingProtonsAnatomical malformationBiophysical tissue propertiesPost-mortem MRIProton densityQuantitative MRI

Identifiers

PMID30465865
PMCPMC7611405
OpenAlexW2900501305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.