Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465809›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2019

Proposed study designs for approval based on a surrogate endpoint and a post-marketing confirmatory study under FDA's accelerated approval regulations for disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs.

V B Kraus, L S Simon, J N Katz, T Neogi, D Hunter, A Guermazi, M A Karsdal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Latest insights in disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs development.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Repurposed and investigational disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis (DMOADs).Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

V B KrausDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: vbk@duke.edu.
L S SimonSDG LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J N KatzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
T NeogiBoston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
D HunterUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
A GuermaziQuantitative Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
M A KarsdalNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev Hovedgade 207, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

Research and Evaluation Support Core Unit (RESCU Core)P30AR072571 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI TUHINA NEOGI · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
The Role of Urate in Knee Osteoarthritis-Related Inflammation, Pathology and PainK24AR070892 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI TUHINA NEOGI · 2017 to 2026
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR070892NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1992, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) instituted the accelerated approval regulations that allow drugs or biologics for serious conditions that fill an unmet medical need to be approved on the basis of a surrogate endpoint or an intermediate clinical endpoint. The current definition of a serious condition includes chronic disabling conditions, such as osteoarthritis (OA), and thereby provides expanded opportunities for the use of biomarkers for regulatory approval of drugs for OA. The use of surrogates or intermediate clinical endpoints for initial regulatory approval of a drug or biologic requires confirmation in a post-marketing study of a drug effect on a clinically relevant outcome, such as on how a patient feels, functions or survives. Current FDA guidance requires that the post-marketing approval (PMA) study be ongoing during the time of initial drug approval. This white paper arose out of the need to brainstorm trial designs that might be suitable for PMA of drugs initially approved, on the basis of a surrogate or intermediate clinical endpoint, for treatment of OA to alter disease progression, abnormal function or pathological changes in the morphology of the joint. In this white paper we define the concept and regulations regarding accelerated approval and propose two major study design scenarios for PMA trials in OA. The long-term goal is to discuss and refine these designs in consultation with regulatory agencies in order to facilitate development of drugs to fill the large unmet need in OA.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological ProductsBiomarkersDrug ApprovalHumansOsteoarthritisResearch DesignUnited StatesBiological ProductsBiomarkersBiomarkerDrug developmentRandomized clinical trialSerious conditionTrial design

Identifiers

PMID30465809
PMCPMC11514055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.