Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30465693›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

An orthotopic non-small cell lung cancer model for image-guided small animal radiotherapy platforms.

Venus Sosa Iglesias, Stefan J van Hoof, Ana Vaniqui, Lotte Ejr Schyns, Natasja Lieuwes, Ala Yaromina, Linda Spiegelberg, Arjan J Groot, Frank Verhaegen, Jan Theys and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A novel orthotopic mouse model replicates human lung cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Vivo Bioluminescence Tomography Center of Mass-Guided Conformal Irradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Radiation-Induced Lung Injury (RILI).Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venus Sosa Iglesias1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Stefan J van Hoof
Ana Vaniqui1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Lotte Ejr Schyns1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Natasja Lieuwes1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Ala Yaromina1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Linda Spiegelberg1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Arjan J Groot1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Frank Verhaegen1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Jan Theys1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Ludwig Dubois1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Marc Vooijs1 Department of Radiotherapy, GROW-School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1386-3027
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methods: An orthotopic non-small cell lung cancer model in NMRI-nude mice was established to investigate the complementary information acquired from 80 kVp microcone-beam CT (micro-CBCT) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) using different angles and filter settings. Different micro-CBCT-based radiation-delivery plans were evaluated based on their dose-volume histogram metrics of tumor and organs at risk to select the optimal treatment plan.

results: H1299 cell suspensions injected directly into the lung render exponentially growing single tumor nodules whose CBCT-based volume quantification strongly correlated with BLI-integrated intensity. Parallel-opposed single angle beam plans through a single lung are preferred for smaller tumors, whereas for larger tumors, plans that spread the radiation dose across healthy tissues are favored.

conclusions: Closely mimicking a clinical setting for lung cancer with highly advanced preclinical radiation treatment planning is possible in mice developing orthotopic lung tumors. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: BLI and CBCT imaging of orthotopic lung tumors provide complementary information in a temporal manner. The optimal radiotherapy plan is tumor volume-dependent.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCone-Beam Computed TomographyDisease Models, AnimalHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMice, NudeRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID30465693
PMCPMC6541189
OpenAlexW2900500640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.