Comparing sulfidation kinetics of silver nanoparticles in simulated media using direct and indirect measurement methods.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Emerging investigator series: metal nanoparticles in freshwater: transformation, bioavailability and effects on invertebrates.Environmental science. Nano · 2022
   Review
2. A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
   Review
3. Development of combined microstructure and structure characterization facility forJournal of applied crystallography · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Funding

Abstract